Personal resilience in the system of additional education of children as a pedagogical phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n3.778-788Keywords:
personality, resilience, educational activity, adaptation, designingAbstract
The dynamism of modern society, bordering on unpredictability and manifesting itself against the background of increased social and environmental risks, stipulates the importance of building resilience in a person – the ability to effectively resist destructive environmental fluctuations. The purpose of the study is to comprehensively analyze resilience as an integral quality of a person. In accordance with the research hypothesis put forward, we developed a questionnaire consisting of 75 statements. The study sample consisted of 918 students and 85 teachers from seven educational institutions of additional education for children from three municipal districts of the Republic of Tatarstan. Correlation analysis (Pearson's linear correlation method) of the obtained results was carried out. Additional research methods were cluster analysis and peer review method. The study revealed internal relationships in the structure of resilience and external relationships. The ability to adequately meet and overcome adverse circumstances and challenges, while becoming stronger, appears to be an important meta-competence, and, at the same time, the target of education. The relationship of resilience with design abilities allows us to assert the possibility of actively using the design method in the educational process as a system-forming factor in the development of students' personal resilience and, as a result, increasing school resilience in general.References
Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social science & medicine, 36(6), 725-733.
Carothers, D., Aydin, H., & Halpern, C. (2021). Campus Attitudes Toward Academic and Social Inclusion of Stu-dents with Intellectual Disability. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.2
Dalziell, E.P., & McManus, S.T. (2004). Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptive Capacity: Implications for System Performance. Stoos, Switzerland: 1st International Forum for Engineering Decision Making (IFED), 5-8 Dec, 17 pp. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/2809
Dunnett, C. W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics, 20(3), 482-491.
Eachus, P. (2014). Community Resilience: Is it greater than the sum of the parts of individual resilience? 4th Inter-national Conference on Building Resilience, Building Resilience, 8-10 September 2014, Salford Quays, United kingdom, 345-351. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00949-6
Evans-Amalu, K., & Claravall, E. (2021). Inclusive Online Teaching and Digital Learning: Lessons Learned in the Time of Pandemic and Beyond. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(1), i-iii. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.4
Garcia, R. (2021). Factors That Influence Students’ Learning Progress in the Science Spiral Progression Curriculum. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(2), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2020.5
Grigoryev, S. L., Saenko, N. R., Volkova, P. S., & Kortunov, V. V. (2022). Medial turn in education: Philosophy of understanding words and images. Frontiers in Education, 7 doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.856616
Isaikina, M., Nedogreeva, N., & Pokotilo, A. (2021). Role of Metasubject Educational Results in Learners’ Profes-sional Self-Consciousness Formation. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-7-18
Kilinç, E., & Tarman, B. (2022). Citizenship types, social media use and speaking a foreign language as predictors of global competence. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 17(1), 49-62. doi:10.1386/ctl_00081_1
Korableva, O. N., Mityakova, V. N., & Kalimullina, O. V. (2020). Designing a decision support system for predicting innovation activity. Paper presented at the ICEIS 2020 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, , 1 619-625.
Kulikova, T. (2021). Interconnection of Time Competence and Stress Resistance of Teachers with Different Work Experience. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-86-105
Li, Z.-S., & Hasson, F. (2020). Resilience, stress, and psychological well-being in nursing students: a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 90, 104440. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104440.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
Luthar, S. S., Sawyer, J., & Brown, P. (2006). Conceptual issues in studies of resilience: Past, present, and future research. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1094, 105-115.
Markova, V.I., Aleksandrova, L.A., Zolotareva, A.A. (2022). Russian version of the Brief Resilience Scale: psycho-metric analysis for the samples of students, parents with many children and parents of disabled children. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 1(45), 65–75. doi: 10.11621/npj.2022.0106
Medvedeva, G., & Mitina, G. (2021). Professional Development of Higher Education Institutions Pedagogical Workers in the Context of the Federal Project «New Opportunities for Everyone». Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-32-47
Muravyova, A. A., & Oleinikova, O. N. (2017). Underestimated competence or pedagogical aspects of the for-mation of resilience. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2, 16-21.
Organizational Resilience. – https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/our-services/Organizational-Resilience/bsi-organizational-resilience-framework/.
Patuano, A., Shentova, R., Aceska, A. (2022). Infrastructure and health: the salutogenic approach, interdisciplinarity and new challenges for planning and design. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(4), 645-658.
Pinskaya, M. A., Kosaretsky, S. G., & Krutiy, N. S. (2012). Accounting for contextual information in assessing the quality of school work. Public Education, 5, 31-35.
Pinskaya, M.A., Havenson, T.E., Kosaretsky, S.G., Zvyagintsev, R.S., Mikhailova, A.M., & Chirkina, T.A. (2018). Above the barriers: Exploring resilient schools. Education Issues, 2, 198-227.
Pinskaya, M.A., Kosaretsky, S.G., & Frumin, I.D. (2011). Schools that work effectively in complex social contexts. Educational Issues. Educational Studies, 4, 148–177. doi: 10.17323 / 1814-9545-2011-4-148-177.
Pogosyan, V. (2021). Updating social theory: Redefinition of modernization. Wisdom. 2021, 19(3), 182–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.486
Saenko, N., Voronkova, O., Volk, M., & Voroshilova, O. (2019). The social responsibility of a scientist: Philosophi-cal aspect of contemporary discussions. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 332-345.
Seville, E., Brunsdon, D., Dantas, A., Le Masurier, J., Wilkinson S., & Vargo J. (2006). Building organizational resilience: A summary of key research findings. Resilient Organisations Research Report 2006/04. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/649
Sheffi, Y. (2007). Building a resilient organization. Bridge-Washington-National Academy of Engineering, 37 (1), 30 p.
Tarman, B., & Kilinc, E. (2022). Predicting high school students’ global civic engagement: A multiple regression analysis. Journal of Social Studies Research, doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2022.02.001
Wu, Y., Sang, Z., Zhang, X.-C., & Margraf, J. (2020). The relationship between resilience and mental health in Chi-nese college students: a longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00108.
Yasvin, V.A. (2001). Educational environment: from modeling to design. M.: Meaning. – 365 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vladislav Vinogradov, Olga Shatunova, Julia Shakurova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.