Science Communication and Education Through Comics

Contributions of Portuguese Stakeholders in a Focus Group

Authors

  • Marina Mota CIDTFF - Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores da Universidade de Aveiro
  • Cristina Manuela Sá CIDTFF - Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores | Departamento de Educação e Psicologia da Universidade de Aveiro
  • Cecília Guerra Unidade de Ensino das Ciências | Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto |CIDTFF - Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores

Keywords:

Science Education, Science Communication, Comics, Focus Groups

Abstract

In this article, we investigate how comics can contribute to the communication and education of scientific concepts to develop scientific literacy among children in the early years of schooling. Adopting a Research & Development (R&D) methodology, we sought to gather the perceptions of Portuguese stakeholders involved in science communication and education initiatives with children in the first cycle of basic education (ages 6 to 10) during the exploratory phase of the project. Two focus group sessions were conducted with a total of 12 participants, aiming to: identify the main challenges related to the communication and learning of scientific concepts involving children; determine which didactic strategies are used by science communication and education professionals, considering formal, non-formal, and informal education contexts; and identify the potential, constraints, and criteria for developing comics for the communication and learning of scientific concepts. The interviews were recorded – with the participants' consent – and the transcriptions were subjected to content analysis. The results show that the main challenge is related to children's difficulty in understanding abstract scientific concepts, requiring strategies and didactic resources that help associate these concepts to situations close to their social context, enabling them to understand science and make scientifically informed decisions. In this context, comics emerge as a highly educational resource, combining different strategies, such as using stories with meaningful characters and contexts for children, employing simple language that integrates texts and images, and utilizing scientific metaphors. The focus groups facilitated the collaborative construction of knowledge on this topic, guiding the next phases of the ongoing R&D project.

References

ffeldt, F., Meinhart, D., & Eilks, I. (2018). The use of comics in experimental instructions in a non-formal chemistry learning context. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380620

Baram-Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and science communication research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21202

Bardin, L. (2002). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.

Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Reserch Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press Inc.

Chung, B. S., Park, E., Kim, S.-H., Cho, S., & Chung, M. S. (2016). Comic Strips to Accompany Science Museum Exhibits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(4), 141. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n4p141

Ciência Viva. (2024). Rede de Centros de Ciência Viva. https://www.cienciaviva.pt/centroscv/rede/

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Dam, R. F. (2024). The 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process

Eisner, W. (2005). Narrativas Gráficas. Devir.

Farinella, M. (2018). The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010401

Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414

Granado, A., & Malheiros, J. (2015). Cultura científica em Portugal: Ferramentas para perceber o mundo e aprender a mudá-lo. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.

Hosler, J., & Boomer, K. B. (2011). Are comic books an effective way to engage nonmajors in learning and appreciating science? CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0090

Julien, H. (2008). Content Analysis. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 120–121).

Kearns, C., & Kearns, N. (2020). The role of comics in public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2020.1761248

Kohen, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Toward narrowing the gap between science communication and science education disciplines. Review of Education, 7(3), 525–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3136

Kuttner, P. J., Weaver-Hightower, M. B., & Sousanis, N. (2021). Comics-based research: The affordances of comics for research across disciplines. Qualitative Research, 21(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120918845

Lestari, R., Haryono, T., & Erman, E. (2021). Using Comic-Based Socio-Scientific Issues in inquiry learning to increase interest and achievement in science learning. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 4(1), 62–81. http://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Thabiea

Lewenstein, B. V. (2015). Identifying what matters: Science education, science communication, and democracy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21201

Lin, S. F., & Lin, H. S. (2016). Learning nanotechnology with texts and comics: the impacts on students of different achievement levels. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1373–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1191089

McKinnon, M., & Vos, J. (2015). Engagement as a Threshold Concept for Science Education and Science Communication. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 5(4), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.986770

Medvecky, F., & Leach, J. (2017). The ethics of science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 16(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16040501

Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083427

Mota, M., Sá, C. M., & Guerra, C. (2021a). A banda desenhada na comunicação e educação em ciência: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Lusofona de Educacao, 51(51), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle51.07

Mota, M., Sá, C. M., & Guerra, C. (2021b). Systematic Literature Review Using Excel Software: A Case of the Visual Narratives in Education. In A. P. Costa, L. P. Reis, A. Moreira, L. Longo, & G. Bryda (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research (pp. 325–340). Springer International Publishing.

Pereira, F. H., & de Oliveira, R. S. (2024). Journalists and scientists together: the public problem of science disinformation in Brazil. Journal of Science Communication, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23030204

Riverdale, & IDEO. (2012). Design Thinking for Educators (2nd ed.).

Rodrigues, A. V. (2016). Perspetiva Integrada de Educação em Ciências: Da teoria à prática (1a). UA Editora.

Rota, G., & Izquierdo, J. (2003). “Comics” as a tool for teaching biotechnology in primary schools. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 6(2), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol6-issue2-fulltext-10

Sá, C. M. (2016). Banda desenhada e desenvolvimento de competências em leitura e escrita. Exedra, Número Temático – Entre a Investigação e as Práticas em Didática do Português: Alguns Diálogos, 37–86.

Sá, C. M. (2017). Desenvolver competências em língua materna a ensinar ciências. Comunicações, 24(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.15600/2238-121x/comunicacoes.v24n1p11-21

Sá, P., Guerra, C., Costa, A., Maria, J., Loureiro, M. J., & Vieira, R. (2013). Courseware SeRe®- um recurso digital para a Educação para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Da conceção do recurso à formação de professores. Indagatio Didactica, 5, 96–120.

Sones, W. W. D. (1944). The Comics and Instructional Method. Journal of Educational Sociology, 18(4), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2262696

Tatalovic, M. (2009). Science comics as tools for science education and communication: a brief, exploratory study. Journal of Science Communication, 8(4), 1–17. http://jcom.sissa.it/

Thomas, R. M. (1995). Comparing theories of child development (4th ed.). Thomson Publishing Inc.

Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation: Critical Perspectives About Science Participation and Emancipation. Science and Education, 30(3), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2

Wayne, C. R., Kaller, M. D., Wischusen, W. E., & Maruska, K. P. (2024). “Fin-tastic Fish Science”: Using a comic book to disseminate and enhance science literacy. Natural Sciences Education, 53(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20135

Wu, L. Y., Wu, S. P., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Merging science education into communication: Developing and validating a scale for Science Edu-Communication utilizing awareness, enjoyment, interest, opinion formation, and understanding dimensions (SEC-AEIOU). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174551

Published

2024-09-24

Issue

Section

Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)