Textual metaphtonymy as opposed to lexical metaphtonymy

Autores

  • Svetlana A. Pesina Hanoi National University of Education
  • Svetlana A. Vinogradova
  • Svetlana V. Kiseleva
  • Nella A. Trofimova
  • Dmitry N. Novikov
  • Natalia N. Tsytsarkina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse3.126-136

Palavras-chave:

metaphtonymy, reproductive metaphor and metonymy, polysemous word, semantics, lexical invariant

Resumo

In this article, we have proposed to differentiate textual and lexical metaphtonymy as different phenomena. We have considered the phenomenon of metaphtonymy at the level of text, a chain of words the length of a sentence, a phrase, and a separate meaning. We propose to reserve the term “metaphtonymy” for cases when we are talking about the cases of embedding “metonymy into metaphor” and “metaphor into metonymy” at the level of the entire text. An algorithm for determining textual metaphtonymy is presented. It is proposed to distinguish “textual metaph-tonymy” or simply “metaphtonymy” from “reproductive metaphor” and “reproductive meton-ymy” as a two-stage or even three-stage tropic transformation. The latter exist at the level of semantics of polysemous words and are a rather rare phenomenon. The work presents meta-phorically inferential metonymy. Component-invariant analysis showed that with a double mechanism of transfer (transfer by contiguity and comparison) it contains in its semantics a double bundle of components, including the identified lexical invariant.

Referências

Agusmidah, & Shalihah, F. (2023). Indonesian migrant workers: a socio-economic analysis with regard to the integrated services practice implementation. Economic Annals-XXI, 203(5-6), 70-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V203-08

Birikh, A. (1995) Metonymy in Modern Russian. Semantic and Grammatical Aspects. Izd-vo Verlag Otto Sagner. Myunkhen,. [In Russian]

Denroche, C. (2015). Metonymy and language: A new theory of linguistic processing. New York/London: Routledge.

Dirven, R. & Pörings, R. (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. P. 349-377.

Goossens, L. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action, Cognitive Linguistics. № 1-3. 1990. P. 323-340.

Jin, S., Lin, Z., Oakley T. Translating Metaphtonymy: Exploring Trainee Translators' Translation Approaches and Underlying Factors, Front Psychol. 2021 № 12. P. 629527.

Karavaev, M.S. (2015) Metaphtonymic models of somatisms, Cognitive phenomenon of metaphor: an interdisciplinary approach. Tambov : Izdatel`skij dom «Derzha-vinskij». [In Russian]

Kiki F., Ayi W., Wikrama W., Lenggogeni L., Burhanudin J. (2023), How to increase organizational commitment by strategic management, Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management 10 (4) 579-584

Naghiyeva Sh. The role of metaphtonymy in the formation of the English economic dis-course, European journal of literature and linguistics. 2016. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/the-role-of-metaphtonymy-in-the-formation-of-the-english-economic-discourse (дата обращения: 04.09.2024).

Paducheva, E.V. (2004) Dynamic models in semantics of vocabulary, Languages of Slavic cultures. [In Russian]

Pesina, S., Timokhina E., Baryshnikova J., Emelyanova O. (2020 a). Experimental study of polysemous words semantics in the light of invariant approach, The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. V. 98. European Publisher. pp. 571-578. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.03.57.

Pesina, S.A., Churilina, L.N., Skvortsova, M.L., Kozhushkova, N.V., Baklykova, T.Yu., Terentieva, N.G. (2020 b). Functioning of polysemantic words in the lexicon, Applied Lin-guistics Research Journal. V. 4. № 9. pp. 64-69. Pustejovsky, J. The Generative Lexicon. Lan-guage. № 17. P. 4. DOI: 10.14744/alrj.2020.24855

Pesina, S.A., Vinogradova S.A., Trofimova N.A., Kostina N.N., Shustova S.V., Akai O.M., Velikanova S.S. (2022). Semantic integrity of a word structure and semantic primitives, Res Militaris. 12(2), 2111-2119.

Pesina, S.A., Yusupova L.G., Vinogradova S.A, Kiseleva S.V, Trofimova N.F., Rudako-va S.V., Baklykova T.Yu. (2021) Functioning of metaphor through the prism of invariant theory in polysemy, Applied Linguistics Research Journal. –. V. 4. № 5. P. 247-252.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-10-24

Edição

Secção

Novel approaches in education, society and culture development

Artigos Similares

Também poderá iniciar uma pesquisa avançada de similaridade para este artigo.

Artigos mais lidos do(s) mesmo(s) autor(es)