Creating a Comfortable Learning Environment: The Role of Teachers and Education Seekers


  • Olena Antoniuk Odessa National Economic University
  • Anton Vertel Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko
  • Alla Kolodyazhna Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design
  • Rymma Kyrychenko Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design
  • Ruslana Mnozhynska Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design



Comfortable learning, psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic pedagogy, education, pedagogical conditions, learning environment


The educational system's primary tasks are to ensure compliance with students' human rights and freedoms. They include the right to education, life and health-safe educational process, and preservation and enhancement of the younger generation's health. Students and teachers demand an educational environment where they feel physically, psychologically, informationally, and socially safe, comfortable, and well-being. Participants in the educational process are interested in organizing a maximally comfortable educational process that can provide proper and safe conditions for children's learning, upbringing, and development. All education stakeholders should actively contribute to students' education and develop their skills to create a healthy and safe lifestyle to achieve these goals. The article aims at highlighting the key perspectives presented in modern research by scholars worldwide on the specifics of the teacher's and student's role in creating a comfortable learning environment. The work intends to reveal the features of the learners' influence on the convenience and efficiency of the educational process. Methodology. During the research, the authors applied the following data processing methods: analysis, information synthesis, abstraction, analogy, and formalization of the theoretical and practical results on the given topic. The study is based on the works of scholars worldwide on the organization of the learning environment at various levels of the educational process. The research findings have identified the fundamental theoretical aspects of creating a comfortable learning environment from the psychological and social conditions perspective in organizing the educational process. During the research process, the authors analyzed the specifics of teachers' and students' contributions to creating a safe learning environment.

Author Biographies

Olena Antoniuk, Odessa National Economic University


Anton Vertel, Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko


Alla Kolodyazhna, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design


Rymma Kyrychenko, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design


Ruslana Mnozhynska, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design



Alghasab, M., Hardman, J., & Handley, Z. (2019). Teacher-student interaction on wikis: fostering collaborative learning and writing. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 10–20.

Aryani, F., Umar, N. F., & Kasim, S. N. O. (2020). Psychological well-being of students in undergoing online learning during pandemi COVID-19. In International Conference on Science and Advanced Technology, 1747–1756.

Beerkens, M. (2018). Evidence-based Policy and Higher Education Quality Assurance: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise. European Journal of Higher Education, 8, 3, 272–287.

Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J. & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning–a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1, 1–17.

Cano, M., Murray, R. & Kourouklis, A. (2022). Can Lean Management Change the Managerial Culture in Higher Education? Studies in Higher Education, 47, 4, 915–927.

Cheung, S.K., Phusavat, K. & Yang, H.H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1, 1-9.

Cipriano, C., Barnes, T. N., Kolev, L., Rivers, S. & Brackett, M. (2019). Validating the emotion-focused interactions scale for teacher–student interactions. Learning Environments Research, 22, 1, 1–12.

Cui, V., French, A. & O’Leary, M. (2021). A Missed Opportunity? How the UK’s Teaching Excellence Framework Fails to Capture the Voice of University Staff. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 9, 1756–1770. 1704721

Dodd, A. L., Priestley, M., Tyrrell, K., Cygan, S., Newell, C. & Byrom, N. C. (2021). University student well-being in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of its conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 30, 3, 375–387.

Falcon, S., Admiraal, W. & Leon, J. (2023). Teachers' engaging messages and the relationship with students' performance and teachers' enthusiasm. Learning and Instruction, 86, 2023, 101750.

Farhah, I., Saleh, A. Y. & Safitri, S. (2021). The role of student-teacher relationship to teacher subjective well-being as moderated by teaching experience. Journal of Education and Learning, 15, 2, 267–274.

Germain-Alamartine, E., Ahoba-Sam, R., Moghadam-Saman, S. & Evers, G. (2021). Doctoral Graduates' Transition to Industry: Networks as a Mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 12, 2680–2695.

Granić, A. & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: a systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 5, 2572–2593.

Hamdan, K. & Amorri, A. (2022). The Impact of Online Learning Strategies on Students' Academic Performance. E-Learning and Digital Education in the Twenty-First Century.

Hazen, B.T., Skipper, J.B., Boone, C.A. & Hill, R.R. (2018). Back in Business: Operations Research in Support of Big Data Analytics for Operations and Supply Chain Management. Annals of Operations Research, 270, 1, 201–211. 1007/s10479-016-2226-0

Hou, A.Y.C., Hill, C., Hu, Z. & Lin, L. (2022). What is Driving Taiwan Government for Policy Change in Higher Education After the Year of 2016 – in Search of Egalitarianism or Pursuit of Academic Excellence? Studies in Higher Education, 47, 2, 338–351.

Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M. & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28, 4–5, 462–512.

Ibaraki, A. (2022). Promoting student well-being through classroom interventions. Teaching of Psychology, 3, 1–12.

Kalashnikova, S., Drach, I., Palamarchuk, O., Ryabchenko, V., Chervona L. (2019). Analiz providnoho vitchyznyanoho ta zarubizhnoho dosvidu shhodo mexanizmiv realizaciyi efektyvnoho vryaduvannya v universytetax [Analysis of leading domestic and foreign experience regarding the mechanisms of implementing effective governance in universities]. (chastyna II). Kyiv: Instytut vyshhoyi osvity NAPN Ukrayiny, 96. [in Ukrainian]

Lokshyna, O.I., Hlushko, O.Z., Dzhurylo, A.P., Kravchenko, C.M., Nikolska, N.V., Tymenko, M.M., Shparyk O.M. (2021). Tendenciyi rozvytku shkilnoyi osvity v krayinax YeS, SShA ta Kytayi: monohrafiya [Trends in the development of school education in the countries of the EU, the USA, and China: a monograph]. Kyiv: KONVI PRINT. 350. [in Ukrainian]

Moscardini, A.O., Strachan, R. & Vlasova, T. (2022). The role of universities in modern society. Studies in Higher Education, 47, 4, 812–830.

Nacionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennya yakosti vyshhoyi osvity [National Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education] (2022). Richnyj zvit Nacionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennya yakosti vyshhoyi osvity za 2021 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education for 2021], 232 ttps:// [in Ukrainian]

Nguyen, T. et al. (2022). How teachers manage their classroom in the digital learning environment – experiences from the University Smart Learning Project. Heliyon, 8, 10, e10817.

Parry, S. & Metzger, E. (2023). Barriers to learning for sustainability: a teacher perspective. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 6.

Poots, A. & Cassidy, T. (2020). Academic expectation, self-compassion, psychological capital, social support, and student well-being. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101506.

Senoner, J., Netland, T. & Feuerriegel, S. (2022). Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Improve Process Quality: Evidence from Semiconductor Manufacturing. Management Science, 68, 8, 5704–5723.

Smith, A. & Firman, K. (2020). The microstructure of the student well-being process questionnaire. Journal of Education, Society, and Behavioral Science, 33, 1, 76–83.

Stoian, C.E., Fărcașiu, M.A., Dragomir, G.-M. & Gherheș, V. (2023). Transition from Online to Face-to-Face Education after COVID-19: The Benefits of Online Education from Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 14, 19, 12812;

Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä M., Kokko, A.K. (2021). Learning environments preferred by university students: a shift toward informal and flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 24, 6.

Xiao, M., Tian Z. & Xu, W. (2023). Impact of teacher-student interaction on students’ classroom well-being under online education environment. Education and Information Technologies.

Yanqing, D., Guangming, C. & Edwards, J.S. (2020). Understanding the Impact of Business Analytics on Innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 281, 3, 673–686. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.021






The global development of innovative technologies and their impact on the educat