Methodological Aspect of Using Distance Learning Platforms in the Educational and Research Activities of Future Higher Education Students


  • Olha Tytarenko Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko
  • Yuliia Sribna Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko
  • Tetiana Borysova Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko
  • Valerii Tytarenko Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko
  • Valentyna Tytarenko Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko
  • Yevhen Kulyk Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko
  • Andryi Tsyna Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko



Higher Education Institution, Distance Learning, Educational Content


The article identifies the pedagogical prerequisites for the use of distance learning (DL) system for students in the educational environment (pedagogical conditions determine the reasons for the transition from the classical to the distance education system; social prerequisites are expressed in the development of society and pedagogical science, the need to solve the problems of the education system itself in the educational environment). The authors also identified the specifics of student learning within the distance learning system in the modern knowledge-intensive environment (the focus of the educational process on the development of research, project, and innovation skills). The research involved the elaboration and experimental testing of a pedagogical model of distance learning in the educational environment based on systemic, synergistic, cybernetic, personality-oriented, and competence-based approaches. This model includes the following components: aims and goals of use; means of achieving them; results and outcomes of activities, content of pedagogical activity, technologies, and available resources. The authors have substantiated the stages of modeling a student's distance learning system in the educational environment (the stage of designing a pedagogical model of DL, the stage of DL functioning (the stage of information and technical support, the stage of filling the DL platform with educational content, the stage of implementation and progressive development), the stage of evaluating the DL results). The paper defines the criteria and indicators for assessing the level of student competencies formation within the distance learning system in the educational environment. It identifies and substantiates the pedagogical conditions for implementing the distance learning system in the academic environment. The article also reveals the pedagogical conditions for the implementation of the distance learning system in the educational environment (the focus of the educational process on the skills formation of research, project, and innovation activities; interaction with external and internal partners in the process of research, project and innovation activities; availability of a system for monitoring the results of project and innovation activities at all stages of its implementation) can be implemented in the teaching of students in science-intensive sectors in other universities.


Akdemir, O. & Koszalka, T.A. (2008). Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1451-1461.

Aristin, Nevy, Purnomo, Agus, Sayono, Joko, & Aliman, Muhammad (2023). Education Quarterly Reviews Student Retention in Distance Learning During the Covid-19 Crisis in Indonesia: Are We Disappointing Them? 6, 125-132.

Banas, Е., & Emory, W. (1998). History and issues of distance learning. Public administration quarterly, 22(3), 365–383.

Bozkurt, A., and others (2015). Trends in Distance Education Research: A Content Analysis of Journals 2009‒2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330–363.

Chusova, O. M. Vakolia, Z. M. & Cheipesh, I. V. (2021). Pedagogical foundations of distance learning. Pedahohichni nauky: realii ta perspektyvy, Vol. 80, Part 2, 167-170. Retrieved from:

Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Respecting voices: How the co-creation of teaching and learning can support academic staff, underrepresented students, and equitable practices. Higher Education, 79(5), 885–901.

Daqian Shi, Ting Wang, Hao Xing, & Hao Xu (2020). A learning path recommendation model based on a multidimensional knowledge graph framework for e-learning.

Dietrich, N., Kentheswaran, K., and others (2020). Attempts, Successes, and Failures of Distance Learning in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, American Chemical Society, Division of Chemical Education, 97 (9), 2448‒2457.

Dystantsiina Osvita [Distance Education]. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy [Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine]. Retrieved from (in Ukrainian)

Henritius, E., Löfström, E., & Hannula, M. S. (2019). University students’ emotions in virtual learning: A review of empirical research in the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 80-100.

Hurzhii, A.M., Hlazunova, O.H., & Voloshyna, T.V. (2020). Digital educational content for the open education system: Modern information technologies and innovative teaching methods in training: methodology, theory, experience, problems, 55 (in Ukrainian)

Ismail, A. O., Mahmood, A. K., & Abdelmaboud, A. (2018). Factors Influencing Academic Performance of Students in Blended and Traditional Domains. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2).

Kapustynska, T. (2022). Everyone is aware: how Prometheus online education works wonders for half a million Ukrainians. Retrieved from: (in Ukrainian)

Kosenchuk, O., & Novyk, I. (2020). Orhanizatsiia diialnosti zakladiv doshkilnoi osvity v period pandemii [Organization of preschool education during the pandemic]. Doshkilne vykhovannia [Preschool education], 9, 17-21. Retrieved from https://uied. (in Ukrainian)

Kristen Reid, Diane L. Butler, Catherine Comfort & Andrew D. J. Potter (2023). Virtual internships in open and distance learning contexts: Improving access, participation, and success for underrepresented students. Distance Education, 44:2, 267-283, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2023.2209029

Lytvynova, S. H., Spirin, O. M., & Anikina, L. P. (2015). Khmarni servisy Office 365 [Office 365 cloud services]: tutorial / Kyiv: Comprint, 170 p. (in Ukrainian).

Mala, I. 2022. Distance learning as an effective tool of management education. Science Notes of KROK University, 2(66), 132–151. (in Ukrainian)

Makedon, Vyacheslav & Krasnikova, Nataliya & Krupskyi, Oleksandr & Stasiuk, Yuliia (2022). Arrangement of Digital Leadership Strategy by Corporate Structures: A Review. Ikonomicheski Izsledvania, 31, 19-40.

Makedon, V., Mykhailenko, O., & Vazov, R. (2021). Dominants and Features of Growth of the World Market of Robotics. European Journal of Management Issues, 29(3), 133-141.

Makedon, V., Zaikina, H., Slusareva, L., Shumkova, O., & Zhmaylova, O. (2019). Rebranding in the Enterprise Market Policy. Proceedings of the 34th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Vision 2025: Education Excellence and Management of Innovations. Through Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: 9472-9476.

McMurtrie, B. (2021). Good grades, stressed students: They struggled with online learning last fall, but not always in the ways you might expect. Chronicle of Higher Education.

Milman, N. B. 2020. Designing asynchronous online discussions for quality interaction in asynchronous online courses. Distance Learning, 17(4), 59-61.

Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Riady, Y. et al. (2023). Covid-19 distance and online learning: a systematic literature review in pharmacy education. BMC Med Educ., 23, 367.

Nozawa, K. (2011). To Moodle or Not To Moodle: Can It Be an Ideal E-Learning Environment? Ritsumeikan University Journal of Policy Science, Bulletin of Universities and Institutes, 289-312.

Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives. New York: Routledge, 34-45.

Ögeyik, M. (2022). Using Bloom's Digital Taxonomy as a framework to evaluate webcast learning experience in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11219–11235. s10639-022-11064-x

Oleshko, A., Rovniahin, О., & Hodz, V. (2021). Udoskonalennia dystantsiinoho navchannia u vyschyi osviti v umovah pandemichnyh obmezhen [Improving distance learning in higher education in the context of pandemic constraints]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, No. 1. (in Ukrainian).

Rachel Fitzgerald, Henk Huijser, Sharon Altena & Ale Armellini (2023). Addressing the challenging elements of distance education. Distance Education, 44:2, 207-212, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2023.2209527

Rice, Mary (2022). Online Learning: March 2022 (26) 1. Online Learning. 26. 10.24059/olj.v26i1.3288.

Romanovskyi, O. H. Kvasnyk, O. V. Moroz, V.M. Pidbutska, N. V. Reznik, S. M. Cherkashyn, A. I. & Shapovalova, V. V. (2019). Development factors and directions for improving distance education in the higher education system of Ukraine, Informatsiini tekhnolohii ta zasoby navchannia, part 74, No 6, 37-42.

Rumble, G. (1989). On defining distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 8-21.

Semih Caliskan, Sibel Suzek, & Deniz Ozcan (2017). Determining student satisfaction in distance education courses. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 529–538.

Shtefan, L. A., & Borzenko, O. P. (2015). Features of the organization of distance learning of student youth in Canada: a retrospective analysis: monohrafiia. Kh.: KhNADU, 219 p. (in Ukrainian)

Shylina, H.A. (2016). Methods of distance learning of the Ukrainian language for primary school students. Dysertatsiia na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia kandydata pedahohichnykh nauk. Kyiv, Rezhym dostupu: Microsoft Word - Shylina_H_A_Dysertatsiia.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Slobodianiuk, І., Myslitska, N., Zabolotnyi, V., & Kolesnykova, О. (2020). Vykorystannia hmaro-oriientovanyh tehnolohii v umovah dystantsiinoho navchannia [The use of cloud-based technologies in distance learning]. Fizyko-matematychna osvita, issue 1(23), vol. 2, 78–82 (in Ukrainian).

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2245–2261.

Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods in inquiry. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Effects of using mobile instant messaging on student behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-22.

Unger, S., & Meiran, W. (2020). Student attitudes towards online education during the COVID-19 viral outbreak of 2020: Distance learning in a time of social distance. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES). 4(4). 256‒266.

Venton, B. J., & Pompano, R. R. (2021). Strategies for enhancing remote student engagement through active learning. In: Springer.

Wеdеmеyеr, C. (1981). Lеаrnіng аt the Bаckdооr: Rеflеctіоns оn nоn-trаdіtіоnаl lеаrnіng іn the lifespan. Mаdіsоn. 130 р.

Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164.

Yuan, Ly (2022). MOOCs and open education. White paper. Retrieved from:



2023-06-23 — Updated on 2023-09-21




The global development of innovative technologies and their impact on the educat