National Soft Law in the Information Society

Authors

  • Ivan Usenkov
  • Marina Davydova
  • Alexandr Konstantinov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n4.1218-1227

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of acts of national soft law and to identify their advantages and disadvantages in the context of determining the possibility of solving with its help, the problems of legal regulation, generated, inter alia, by the informatization and globalization of law, for example, the problem of instability of legislation. Methods such as formal logic, systemic and structural analysis, thought experiments, legal forecasting, and modeling using ideal models are applied. The following official documents are considered to constitute acts of national soft law because they are commonly used in domestic legal regulations: official explanations, planning documents, and recommendations. Such documents have been investigated for their impact on the stability of the Russian legal system. National soft laws have shown their significant potential in this area, because they, first of all, possess greater stability than traditional laws, and secondly, they are able to avoid additional legislative changes.

References

Bespalova N.A., Sibirtsev A.V., & Yakovleva T.S. (2021). Social System Management in the Context of Interaction Between Society and the Educational Process in a Technical University. Sovremennye issledovania socialnyh problem [Modern Studies of Social Issues], 13(1),14-30, doi: https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-1-14-30

Davydova, M.L. (2020). Formation and Normalization of Legal Terminology in the Field of Digital Technologies. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 19 (4), 52-63 (2020). (in Russian).

Demichev, I. (2021). Virtuality and networking: about the socio-cultural communities of the information age (answer to mg bresler’s monograph ‘the ontology of network existence’). Modern Studies of Social Issues, 13(2), 14-37.https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-2-14-37

Drahos, P., & Krygier, M. (2017). Regulation, institutions and networks. Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications, 1-22.

Gill, B., & Huang, Y. (2023). Sources and limits of Chinese ‘soft power’. In Survival (pp. 17-35). Routledge.

Gribnau, H. (2007). Soft law and taxation: The case of the Netherlands. Legisprudence, 1(3), 291-326.

Jamali Kivi, P., Namaziandost, E., Fakhri Alamdari, E., Ryafikovna Saenko, N., Inga-Arias, M., Fuster-Guillén, D., ... & Nasirin, C. (2021). The comparative effects of teacher versus peer-scaffolding on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 50, 1031-1047.. doi:10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4

Jamalpour, H., & Verma, A. (2022). Introduction to Psychoanalysis: A New Perspective on Linguistics and Psychoanalysis, Vol. 1, Rose Publication PTY LTD, Melbourne, Australia.

Kilinç, E., & Tarman, B. (2022). Citizenship types, social media use and speaking a foreign language as predictors of global competence. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 17(1), 49-62. doi:10.1386/ctl_00081_1

Nye, J. S. (2023). American soft power in the age of Trump. In Soft Power and Great-Power Competition: Shifting Sands in the Balance of Power Between the United States and China (pp. 71-73). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Oguilve, V., Wen, W., Bowen, E., Abourehab, Y., Bermudez, A., Gaxiola, E., & Castek, J. (2021). Community Making: An Expansive View of Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(1), 69-100. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.8

Otts, E. V., Panova, E. P., Lobanova, Y. V., Bocharnikova, N. V., Panfilova, V. M., & Panfilov, A. N. (2021). Modification of the role of a teacher under the conditions of distance learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(21), 219-225. doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i21.25675

Pashina, L. (2021). The Main Research Topics of the Social Aspects of Ageing in a Foreign Science. Modern Studies of Social Issues, 13(2), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-2-38-54

Pogosyan, V. (2021). Updating social theory: Redefinition of modernization. Wisdom. 9(3), 182–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.486

Ritter, M. (2020). Civility and Shared Fate: Social Studies Teaching as Teaching for Belonging. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.02.01.1

Saenko, N., Voronkova, O., Zatsarinnaya, E., & Mikhailova, M. (2020). Philosophical and cultural foundations of the concept of “nihitogenesis”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), 88-103.

Sandugei, A.N. (2019). Administrative law and process 8, 45-48 (2019). (in Russian).

Tarman, B., & Kilinc, E. (2022). Predicting high school students’ global civic engagement: A multiple regression analysis. Journal of Social Studies Research, doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2022.02.001

Vagizova, V. (2021). Political Cartoon as a Genre of Polycode Text Within The Propaganda Discourse. Modern Studies of Social Issues, 13(2), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-2-71-91

Volkova, P., Luginina, A., Saenko, N., & Samusenkov, V. (2020). Virtual reality: Pro et contra. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 190-203.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-19

Issue

Section

Novel approaches in education, society and culture development

Most read articles by the same author(s)