Instruction without lectures? Issues of freedom and safety in the context of MAPE model

Authors

  • Francisco Sousa University of the Azores and Research Centre on Child Studies, Portugal http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1080-5449
  • Ana Cristina Palos CICS.NOVA.UAc – Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais, Pólo da Universidade dos Açores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v11.n4.581-593

Abstract

In Portuguese language, the word aula (lecture) is etymologically rooted in the Greek word άυλή, which, in Ancient Greece, meant “courtyard†and suggested a balance between freedom and safety for nomadic shepherds and animals. Nowadays lectures are subject to huge restrictions in terms of time and space, which has strong implications for freedom and safety. However, the development of online instruction, especially in its asynchronous version, stimulates reflection on a possible recovery of the original meaning of άυλή, or even on the possibility of providing instruction without lectures, for asynchronous online instruction dilutes the work of instructors and students in time and space and naturally calls for students’ active participation in the educational process. Accordingly, after some reflections on the concept of άυλή, and on its relation with the concepts of freedom and safety, we report an empirical study, which was aimed at understanding how some teachers, who were attending teacher education courses, viewed asynchronous online learning. Considering that the participants had been exposed to MAPE model, they commented, in the context of interviews, some aspects of online learning in general and specific aspects of that same model, especially aspects that could be related to issues of freedom and safety. The findings of the study suggest that the participants acknowledge that MAPE model, overall, allows for much freedom and safety, despite the fact that some of them stated that they did not feel so safe with regard to some specific aspects.

Author Biography

Francisco Sousa, University of the Azores and Research Centre on Child Studies, Portugal

Faculty of Social and Human Sciences

References

Almeida, L. S. (2007). Transição, adaptação académica e êxito escolar no ensino superior. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 14, (2), 203-215. Disponível em: http://ruc.udc.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/2183/7078/RGP_15-14_Cong.pdf?sequence=1

Alves, N. A., Abrantes, P., Rodrigues, C. F. & Dias, P. C. (2014). TIC no ensino secundário: usos e mediações. Forum Sociológico [Online], 23. Disponível em: http://sociologico.revues.org/861

Barroso, J. (1995). Os Liceus. Organização pedagógica e administração (1836-1960). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian e Junta Nacional de Investigação Científica e Tecnológica.

Beillerot, J. (1987). A sociedade pedagógica. Lisboa: Rés Formalpress.

Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La Reproduction. Paris: Minuit.

Canário, R. (1999). Educação de adultos: um campo e uma problemática. Lisboa: EDUCA.

Canário, R. (2008). “A Escola: das ‘promessas’ à s ‘incertezas’â€. Educação Unisinos, 12 (2), 73-81. Disponível em: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/educacao/article/view/5309

Canário, R., Alves, N., & Rolo, C. (2001). A Escola e a exclusão social. Lisboa: EDUCA.

Cassebaum, A. (2003). Revisiting summerhill. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (8), 575-578. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/003172170308400806

D’Espiney, R. & Canário, R. (1994). Uma escola em mudança com a comunidade. Projeto ECO, 1986-1992: experiências e reflexões. Lisboa: EDUCA.

Dubet, F. (1991). Les Lycéens. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Erickson, F. et al. (2008). Students’ experience of school curriculum: The everyday circumstances of granting and withholding assent to learn. In F. M. Connelly (Ed.). The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 198-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Fino, C. (2017). Um século de máquinas de ensinar, 50 anos de máquinas de aprender. Revista Hipótese, 3 (3), 58-74. Disponível em: http://www3.uma.pt/carlosfino/publicacoes/CNFino_Hipotese2017v3n3.pdf

Freire, A. C. (2005). Projectos curriculares de turma – da formalização à gestão contextualizada. In M. C. Roldão (Org.), Estudos de práticas de gestão do currículo: que qualidade de ensino e de aprendizagem? (pp. 77-103). Lisboa: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

Freire, P. (1987). Pedagogia do oprimido (17ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

Freire, P. (2016). Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa (53ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

Gomes, A. (2003). A aula. Porto: Porto Editora.

Graham, C. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. Bonk & C. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-2). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Illich, I. (1985). Sociedade sem escolas. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Lahire, B. (2008). La forme scolaire dans tous ces états. Revue Suisse des Sciences de L’éducation, 30 (2), 229-258. Disponível em: https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2011/4217/pdf/SZBW_2008_H2_S229_Lahire_D_A.pdf

Lopes, J. T. (1996). Tristes escolas – práticas culturais estudantis no espaço escolar urbano. Porto: Afrontamento.

Maroy, C. (1994). La formation post-scolaire: extension ou infléchissement de la forme scolaire. In G. Vincent (Dir.), L'éducation prisonnière de la forme scolaire ? (pp. 125-147). Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.

Martins, C. F. (2015, 1 de setembro). Quando a escola deixar de ser uma fábrica de alunos. Público [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.publico.pt/2013/09/01/jornal/quando-a-escola-deixar-de-ser-uma-fabrica-de-alunos-27008265

Maulini, O. & Perrenoud, P. (2005). La forme scolaire de l’éducation de base: tensions internes et évolutions. In O. Maulini & C. Montandon (Éds.), Les formes de l’éducation: variété et variation (pp. 147-168). Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Monteiro, A., Leite, C. & Barros, R. (2016). "Eu ganhei mais o gosto de estudar": o e-learning como um meio de aprendizagem ao longo da vida de reclusas de um estabelecimento prisional português. Educação e Sociedade, 10, 1-22. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0101-73302016005004101&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt

Neill, A. (2006). Summerhill School. In M. Vaughan (Ed.), Summerhill and A. S. Neill (pp. 5-64). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070600572090

Pais, J. M. (1993). Culturas juvenis. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.

Pais, J. M. (1999). Comportamentos dos adolescentes de hoje. In M. Pinto, J. C. Tedesco, J. M. Pais & A. P. Relvas (Orgs.), As Pessoas que moram nos alunos – ser jovem, hoje, na escola portuguesa (pp. 49-73). Porto: ASA.

Palos, A. C. (2007). Empenhados ou desinteressados? Perspectivas dos jovens acerca dos seus trajectos e projectos escolares. In S. N. Caldeira (Org.), (Des)ordem na escola. Mitos e realidades (pp.107-129). Coimbra: Quarteto.

Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ribeiro, A. C. (1993). Desenvolvimento curricular (4ª ed.). Lisboa: Texto Editora.

Roldão, M. C. (1999). Os professores e a gestão do currículo: Perspectivas e práticas em análise. Porto: Porto Editora.

Smart, K. & Cappel, J. (2006). Students' perceptions of online learning: a comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 201-219. Disponível em: http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol5/v5p201-219Smart54.pdf

Sousa, F. (2015). O desenvolvimento de um modelo de ensino virtual num contexto de investimento incipiente em e-learning: progressos e desafios. Da Investigação à s Práticas, 5(1), 79-97. Disponível em: https://ojs.eselx.ipl.pt/index.php/invep/article/view/14

Stronach, I. (2006). Inspection and justice: HMI and Summerhill school. In M. Vaughan (Ed.), Summerhill and A. S. Neill (pp. 118-136). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Stronach, I. & Piper, H. (2008). Can liberal education make a comeback ? The case of “relational touch†at Summerhill school, American Educational Research Journal, 45 (1), 6-37. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0002831207311585

Vincent, G. (2008). La socialisation démocratique contre la forme scolaire. Éducation et Francophonie, 36 (2), 47-62. Disponível em: https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/ef/2008-v36-n2-ef2872/029479ar

Vincent, G., Lahire, B. & Thin, D. (1994). Sur l´histoire et la théorie de la forme scolaire. In G. Vincent (Dir.), L'éducation prisonnière de la forme scolaire ? (pp. 11-48). Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.

Willis, P. E. (1977): Learning to labour. How working class kids get working class jobs. Aldershot: Gower.

Woods, P. (1980) (Ed.). Pupil strategies: explorations in the sociology of the school. London: Croom Helm.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (2), 64-70. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Published

2018-12-29

Issue

Section

Teacher education in a context of cyberculture

Most read articles by the same author(s)