The gender perspective and the critical pedagogy: the use of portfolio as a reflexive tool for teaching psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021.17-30Abstract
In this text I present arguments about the importance of including the analysis of the gender category both in teaching and in the practice, theorization and dissemination of the psychological discipline, focusing on the use of the e-portfolio as a tool for the development of reflective and critical thinking, based on a teaching-learning experience with professionals in clinical psychology and psychotherapy.References
Andrus, S., Jacobs, Ch., & Kuriloff, P. (2018). Miles to go: The continuing quest for gender equity in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan 100(2):46–50.
Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior (ANUIES). (2020). Anuario estadístico de educación superior, Licenciatura. Ciclo escolar 2018-2019. Recuperado de http://www.anuies.mx/informacion-y-servicios/informacion-estadistica-de-educacion-superior/anuario-estadistico-de-educacion-superior
Badia, A. (2006). Ayuda al aprendizaje con tecnología en la educación superior. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(2), 5-19.
Biggs, J., Hawley, P. H., & Biernat, M. (2018). The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions. Sex Roles, 78(5), 394–408. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9
Boscolo, L., y Bertrando, P. (2008). Terapia sistémica individual. Amorrortu editores.
Buchanan, N. T., & Wiklund, L. O. (2020). Why Clinical Science Must Change or Die: Integrating Intersectionality and Social Justice. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 309–329. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729470
Casadevall, A. (2015). Achieving Speaker Gender Equity at the American Society for Microbiology General Meeting. mBio, 6(4), e01146-15. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01146-15
Casadevall, A., & Handelsman, J. (2014). The Presence of Female Conveners Correlates with a Higher Proportion of Female Speakers at Scientific Symposia. mBio, 5(1), e00846-13. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00846-13
Castell, E., Bullen, J., Garvey, D., & Jones, N. (2018). Critical Reflexivity in Indigenous and Cross-cultural Psychology: A Decolonial Approach to Curriculum? American Journal of Community Psychology, 62(3–4), 261–271. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12291
Choo, E. K., & DeMayo, R. F. (2018). A lexicon for gender bias in academia and medicine. Bmj, 363.
Colgan, J. (2017). Gender bias in international relations graduate education? New evidence from Syllabi. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 456–460.
Collins, F. (2019). Time to end the manel tradition. Bethsesda (MD): National Institutes of Health.
Consuegra, E., Engels, N., y Willegems, V. 2016. Using video-stimulated recall to investigate teacher awareness of explicit and implicit gendered thoughts on classroom interactions. Teachers and Teaching 22(6):683–99. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1158958.
Crenshaw, K. (2012). “Cartografiando los márgenes. Interseccionalidad, políticas identitarias, y violencia contra las mujeres de color. En Platero, Raquel (Lucas)”. Pp. 87–122 en Intersecciones, cuerpos y sexualidades en la encrucijada”. España: Ediciones Bellaterra.
D’Arrigo?Patrick, J., Hoff, C., Knudson?Martin, C., & Tuttle, A. (2017). Navigating critical theory and postmodernism: Social justice and therapist power in family therapy. Family Process, 56(3), 574–588.
Débarre, F., Rode, N. O., & Ugelvig, L. V. (2018). Gender equity at scientific events. Evolution Letters, 2(3), 148–158. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.49
Díaz Barriga, F., Romero, E., & Heredia, A. (2011a). El portafolio electrónico como instrumento para la reflexión sobre el desarrollo profesional y la formación en estudiantes de posgrado. Observar. Revista electrónica de didáctica de las artes, (5), 7–20.
Díaz Barriga, F., Romero, E., & Heredia, A. (2011b). Los e-portafolios de aprendizaje como recurso de reflexión y evaluación auténtica: Una experiencia con estudiantes universitarios de psicología. Virtual Educa 2011.
Díaz Barriga, F., Romero, E., & Heredia, A. (2012). Diseño tecnopedagógico de portafolios electrónicos de aprendizaje: Una experiencia con estudiantes universitarios. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 14(2), 103–117.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Park, J. (2014a). An incomplete list of eminent psychologists of the modern era. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 2(1), 20–31. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000006
Díez Gutiérrez, E., & Rodríguez Fernández, J. R. (2020). Educación para el bien común, hacia una práctica crítica, inclusiva y comprometida socialmente. Barcelona: Octaedro Editorial.
Doig, B., Illsley, B., McLuckie, J., & Parsons, R. (2006). Using ePortfolios to enhance reflective learning and development. En Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 158–167). IGI Global.
Drudy, Sheelagh, y Máire Úi Chatháin. 2002. “Gender Effects in Classroom Interaction: Data Collection, Self-Analysis and Reflection”. Evaluation & Research in Education 16(1):34–50. doi: 10.1080/09500790208667005.
Eagly, A. H., & Miller, D. I. (2016). Scientific Eminence: Where Are the Women? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 899–904 Recuperado de. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616663918
Farías Martínez, G. M., & Ramírez Montoya, M. S. (2010). Desarrollo de cualidades reflexivas de profesores en formación inicial a través de portafolios electrónicos. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 15(44), 141-162.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogía del oprimido (Segunda edición). México: Siglo XXI.
Freire, P., y Faúndez, A. (2013). Hacia una pedagogía de la pregunta. Crítica a una educación basada en respuestas a preguntas inexistentes. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI.
García, M. I. A., & Martínez, E. G. (2014). El portafolios formativo: Un recurso para la reflexión y auto-evaluación en la docencia. Perfiles educativos, 36(143), 105–123.
Good, J., y Moss-Racusin, C. (2010). “‘But, that doesn’t Apply to Me’: Teaching College Students to Think about Gender”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 34:418–24.
Goodyear, H., Bindal, T., & Wall, D. (2013). How useful are structured electronic Portfolio templates to encourage reflective practice? Medical teacher, 35(1), 71–73.
Grogan, K. E. (2019). How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(1), 3–6. Recuperado de Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4
Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From Buzzword to Critical Psychology: An Invitation to Take Intersectionality Seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473
Gvozdanovi?, J., & Maes, K. (2018). Implicit bias in academia: A challenge to the meritocratic principle and to women’s careers-and what to do about it. Technical Report 23. Advice paper.
Haggbloom, S. J., Warnick, R., Warnick, J. E., Jones, V. K., Yarbrough, G. L., Russell, T. M., … Monte, E. (2002). The 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th Century. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 139–152. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139
Hardt, H., Kim, H. J., Smith, A. E., & Meister, P. (2019). The Gender Readings Gap in Political Science Graduate Training. The Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1528–1532.
Harrington, K., & Luo, T. (2016). Eportfolios: Supporting reflection and deep learning in high-impact practices. Peer Review: Association of American Colleges & Universities, 18(3).
Inácio, M. J., & Salema, M. H. (2011). The competence of learning to learn in vocational training: Promoting reflective thinking of the trainer of trainers, mediated by reflexive portfolio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 611–619. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.283
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). (2018). Profesionales sanitarios colegiados. Nota de prensa. Recuperado de https://www.ine.es/prensa/epsc_2018.pdf
Jester, N. (2018). Representation within higher education curricula: Contextualising and advocating for feminist digital activism. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 606–618.
Jones, S. M., y Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of educational research 74(4):443–71.
Kaatz, A., Gutierrez, B., & Carnes, M. (2014). Threats to objectivity in peer review: The case of gender. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 35(8), 371–373. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2014.06.005
Keller, E. F. (1985). Re?ections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press.: CN: Yale University Press.
Klein, R. S., Voskuhl, R., Segal, B. M., Dittel, B. N., Lane, T. E., Bethea, J. R., … Cross, A. H. (2017b). Speaking out about gender imbalance in invited speakers improves diversity. Nature Immunology, 18(5), 475–478. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3707
Knudson-Martin, C. (2012). Why Power Matters: Creating a Foundation of Mutual Support in Couple Relationships. Family Process 52(1):5–18. doi: 10.1111/famp.12011.
Macias-Esparza, L. K. (2020). Género, interseccionalidad e inclusión educativa. En El aula es la Respuesta. (pp. 44–54). Guadalajara: Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara.
Macias-Esparza, L. K., & Laso, E. (2017). Una propuesta para abordar la doble ceguera: La Terapia Familiar Crítica sensible al Género. Revista de psicoterapia, 28(106), 129–148. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v28i106.143
Mansvelder-Longayroux, D. D., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2007). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 23(1), 47–62.
Martín-Baró, I. (1998). Psicología de la liberación para América Latina. Madrid: Trotta.
Martin, J. L. (2014). Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(11), e1003903–e1003903. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003903
Martínez, G. M. F., & Montoya, M. S. R. (s/f). La formación reflexiva de los docentes mediante el desarrollo del portafolio electrónico de evidencias.
McDowell, T., & Shelton, D. (2002). Valuing ideas of social justice in MFT curricula. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(2), 313–331.
McDowell, T., Knudson?Martin, C., & Bermudez, J. M. (2019). Third?order thinking in family therapy: Addressing social justice across family therapy practice. Family process, 58(1), 9–22.
Medina, R. (2018). Cambios modestos, grandes revoluciones: Terapia familiar crítica (Segunda Edición). Guadalajara: Imagia.
Morreale, C., & Zile-Tamsen, V. (2017). Thinking Skills by Design: Using a Capstone ePortfolio to Promote Reflection, Critical Thinking, and Curriculum Integration. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(1), 13–28.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
National Science Foundation. (2018). Survey of earned doctorates. Recuperado de https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/ids/sed
Odic, D., & Wojcik, E. H. (2020). The publication gender gap in psychology. American Psychologist, 75(1), 92–103. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000480
Oner, D., & Adadan, E. (2016). Are integrated portfolio systems the answer? An evaluation of a web-based portfolio system to improve preservice teachers’ reflective thinking skills. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(2), 236–260. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9108-y
Organización de las Naciones Unidas ONU (1979). Convención sobre la eliminación de todas las formas de discriminación contra la mujer. CEDAW.
Parkes, K. A., Dredger, K. S., & Hicks, D. (2013). EPortfolio as a Measure of Reflective Practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 99–115.
Penfold, R., Knight, K., Al-Hadithy, N., Magee, L., & McLachlan, G. (2019). Women speakers in healthcare: Speaking up for balanced gender representation. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(3), 167–171. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0027
Phull, K., Ciflikli, G., & Meibauer, G. (2018). Gender and bias in the International Relations curriculum: Insights from reading lists. European Journal of International Relations, 25(2), 383–407. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118791690
Powell, K. (2018). The power of diversity. Nature, 558(7708), 19–22. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05316-5
Prieto, L. (2008). La enseñanza universitaria centrada en el aprendizaje: Estrategias útiles para el profesorado. Octaedro-Universitat de Barcelona. Institut de Ciències de l’Educació.
Pujolà, J.-T. (2019). El portafolio digital en la docencia universitaria. Barcelona: Octaedro Editorial.
Régner, I., Thinus-Blanc, C., Netter, A., Schmader, T., & Huguet, P. (2019). Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(11), 1171–1179. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0686-3
Rowley, J., Munday, J., & Polly, P. (2018). Preparing Future Career Ready Professionals: A Portfolio Process to Develop Critical Thinking Using Digital Learning and Teaching. En Teaching and Learning in a Digital World. Springer, Cham (pp. 702–707). Springer, Cham.
Rowley, Jennifer, & Munday, J. (2014). A “sense of self” through reflective thinking in ePortfolios. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(7), 78–85.
Rutherford, A. (2020). Doing science, doing gender: Using history in the present. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000134
Sayós, R. (2013). Las competencias transversales en las titulaciones de grado de la Universidad de Barcelona. Orientaciones para su desarrollo. Cuadernos de Docencia Universitaria, 27.
Sayós, R., & Torras, F. (2019). Promover el aprendizaje reflexivo y la autonomía de aprendizaje a través del portafolio digital. En El portafolio digital en la docencia universitaria (pp. 27–42). Barcelona: Octaedro Editorial.
Schön, D. A. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos: Hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Paidós.
Schucan Bird, K., & Pitman, L. (2020). How diverse is your reading list? Exploring issues of representation and decolonisation in the UK. Higher Education, 79(5), 903–920. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00446-9
Slepcevic-Zach, P., & Stock, M. (2018). EPortfolio as a tool for reflection and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 291–307. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437399
Smith, A. E., Hardt, H., Meister, P., & Kim, H. J. (2020). Gender, race, age, and national origin predict whether faculty assign female-authored readings in graduate syllabi. Political Science & Politics, 53(1), 100–106. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519001239
Smith, E. (2011). Teaching critical reflection. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 211–223. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.515022
Solsona, N. (2015). Los saberes científicos de las mujeres en el currículum. Revista Qurriculum, 28, 33–54.
Stella, M. (2017). Gendered Patterns in Teacher-Student Interaction in EFL Classroom: The Greek Context. Journal of Language and Education 3(3).
The Editors of the Lancet Group. (2019). The Lancet Group’s commitments to gender equity and diversity. The Lancet, 394(10197), 452–453. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31797-0
Wakimoto, D. K., & Lewis, R. E. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of eportfolios: Uses for reflection, development, and assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 53–58.
West, Candance, & Zimmerman, D. (1999). Haciendo género. Sexualidad, género y roles sexuales, 109–143.
