Analysis of Flaws in Graphical Representations of Statistical Data in the Field of Occupational Safety and Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n1.9-22Keywords:
Occupational safety and health, OSH, statistical literacy, statistical graphsAbstract
The relevance of statistical data in society, imposes an urgent need for statistical literacy of all individuals. This need resulted in a reinforcement of the study of Statistics, with repercussions at all levels of education, and with a particular focus on the training of professionals whose activity will involve the processing of statistical data. In the area of occupational safety and health, as in other areas, the professionals involved in the process of collecting, organizing, analysing and reporting statistical data, use various statistical methods and tools, which, in the outcome of the process, will allow them to appreciate, translate, reveal, and communicate the information contained in the data. Due to the important contribution that statistical graphs provide in the task of organizing and presenting data in reports, improving the efficiency in the transmission of information, it is imperative to ensure the correctness and adequacy of these representations. In this research, triggered by the authors' concern with the inadequacy of many of the graphs produced in the field of safety and health at work, we analysed the statistical graphs belonging to three technical reports, in the context of safety and health at work, focusing on aspects that violate the guide principles for the construction of statistical graphs. For this purpose, we undertake an exploratory approach investigation, using qualitative methods, and bibliographic data collection. The results reveal the presence of numerous weaknesses in the graphs, violating some of the most important principles that should govern the construction of statistical graphs, and which may compromise the validity and usefulness of these graphs.References
Albert, J. A., Ruiz, B., & Sánchez, T. (2014). Un acercamiento cognitivo al significado de estadístico, como variable aleatoria, en estudiantes universitarios. Cuarto Encuentro Internacional en la Enseñanza de la Probabilidad y Estadística. Puebla, BUAP.
Arteaga, P., Batanero, C., Cañadas, G., & Contreras, M. (2011). Las Tablas y Gráficas como Objetos Culturales. Números. Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas, 76, 55-67.
Batanero, C. (2004). Los retos de la cultura estadística. Yupana, 1 (1), 27–37.
Beattie, V., & Jones, M.J. (2000). Changing graph use in corporate annual reports: a time-series analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17 (2), 213–226.
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62, 750–762.
Benavente, A., Rosa, A., Costa, A. F., & Ávila, P. (1996). A Literacia em Portugal: resultados de uma pesquisa extensiva e monográfica. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian
Bertin, J. (1967). Semiologie Graphique. English translation by William Berg & Howard Wainer (1983) and published as Semiology of graphics, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bordage, G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Academic Medicine, 76(9), 889–96.
Claydon, L.S. (2015). Rigour in quantitative research. Nurs Stand., 29(47), 43-48.
Cleveland, W. (1993). Visualizing Data. Hobart Press.
Cooper, R., Schriger, D., & Close, R. (2002). Graphical literacy: the quality of graphs in a large-circulation journal. Annals of emergency medicine, 40, 317–322.
Curcio, F. R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 382–393.
Curcio, F. R. (1989). Developing graph comprehension: elementary and middle school activities. Reston, VA: NCTM.
D´Ambrosio, U. (2005). Sociedade, cultura, matemática e seu ensino. Educação e Pesquisa, 31(1), 99–120.
Fernandes, J. (2009). Ensino e aprendizagem da estatística: realidades e desafios. In C. Costa, E. Mamede, F. Guimarães (org.), Atas do XIX Encontro de Investigação em Educação Matemática.
Fiorentini, D., & Lorenzato, S. (2009). Investigação em educação matemática: percursos teóricos e metodológicos (2ªed.). Campinas: Autores Associados.
Friel, S., Curcio, F., & Bright, G. (2001). Making sense of graphs: critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158.
Fung, K. (2005). Junk charts: Recycling chart junk as junk art. Disponível em: https://junkcha rts.typepad.com/junk_charts/2005/10/the_selfsuffici.html
Gal, I. (2000). The numeracy challenge. In I. Gal (Eds.), Adult numeracy development: Theory, research, practice, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 1–25.
Gal, I. (2002). Adults’statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities.International Statistical Review, 70 (1), 1–25.
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75 (3), 372–396.
Garfield, J. B., Ben-Zvi, D., Chance, B., Medina, E., Roseth, C., & Zieffler, A. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Developing Students’ Statistical Reasoning: Connecting Research and Teaching Practice (January), 1–408.
Garfield, J., Delmas, R., & Chance, B. (2003). Web-based assessment resource tools for improving statistical thinking. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association [Apresentação em Conferência]. Chicago.
Huff, D. (1954). How to lie with statistics. New York: W. W. Norton.
IALS (1996). International Adult Literacy Survey. IALS; Statistics Canada and OECD.
Kanno, M. (2013). Infografe: Como e porque usar infográficos para criar visualizações e comunicar de forma imediata e eficiente. Infolide. São Paulo.
Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Washington DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Kosslyn, S. (1989) Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3,185–226
Langrall, C., Nisbet, S., & Mooney, E. (2006). The interplay between students’ statistical knowledge and context knowledge in analyzing data. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Working cooperatively in statistics education: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics – ICOTS7, Salvador, Brazil, pp. 5–6.
Lei nº 102/2009 de 10 de Setembro - Regime jurídico da promoção da segurança e saúde no trabalho. Disponível em: https://data.dre.pt/application/conteudo/490009.
Lei n.º 42/2012 de 28 de agosto - Aprova os regimes de acesso e de exercício das profissões de técnico superior de segurança no trabalho e de técnico de segurança no trabalho. Disponível em: https://dre.pt/application/file/a/174639.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60 (1), 1–63.
Lopes, P. (2011). Literacia(s) e literacia mediática. CIES e-Working Paper nº110.
López-Nuñez, B. (2016). The use and misuse of graphs in stand-alone annual reports. Work Project - Double Master Degree in Management with major in Finance. NOVA School of Business and Economics & Fundação Getulio Vargas.
Marquart, F. (2017). Methodological Rigor in Quantitative Research. In J. Matthes, C.S. Davis, R.F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Murnane, R.J., Sawhill, I., & Snow, C. (2012). Literacy Challenges for the Twenty-First Century: Introducing the Issue. The Future of Children: Literacy Challenges for the Twenty-First Century, 22(2), 3–15.
Roth, W., & Bowen, G. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159–194.
Rumsey, D. (2002). Statistical Literacy as a Goal for Introductory Statistics Courses, Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678.
Santos, C., & Dias, C. (2015). Numeracia: uma janela com vista para a sociedade da informação. In S. Pereira & M. Toscano (Eds.) Literacia, Media e Cidadania - Livro de Atas do 3.º Congresso, Braga CECS, pp. 84–99.
Shaughnessy, J.M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F.K. Lester (Ed.) The Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics (pp. 957–1010). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Tairab, H. H., & Al-Naqbi, A. K. (2004). How do secondary school science students interpret and construct scientific graphs. Journal of Biological Education, 38, 127–132.
Tauber, L. M. (2010). Análisis de elementos básicos de alfabetización estadística en tareas de interpretación de gráficos y tablas descriptivas. Ciencias Económicas, 1 (12), 53–74.
Tufte, E. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphic Press, Cheshire, CT.
Vanderplas, S., Cook, D., & Hofmann, H. (2020). Testing Statistical Charts: What Makes a Good Graph? Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 7(1), 61–88.
Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 14–23.
Wainer, H. (2013). Medical illuminations: Using evidence, visualization and statistical thinking to improve healthcare. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wallgren, A., Wallgren, B., Persson, R., Jorner, U., & Haaland, J. (1996). Graphing statistics & data: creating better charts. Sweden: Sage Publications.
Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Carla Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.