The Use of Scratch in Professional Full-Time High School of the Regional Superintendence of Education of Uberaba, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v12.n4.438-454Abstract
With the advancement of Digital Information and Communication Technologies in different areas of society, the importance of knowing how to use and understanding their implications in people's lives is evidenced, in addition, it is necessary and important for the school to critically adopt the use of technologies in their educational processes. In the research, a general survey was carried out on the use of the Computer Laboratory of the state schools of the Superintendência Regional de Ensino de Uberaba (SRE Uberaba), by the perception of teachers, to investigate the view that teachers have of this environment, their difficulties and which software they use. Based on the perceptions of the teachers, the objective is to present possibilities for using the Scratch software to teachers of Ensino Médio em Tempo Integral Profissional, from the state schools Boulanger Pucci and Escritora Carolina Maria de Jesus from SRE Uberaba, as an option to diversify their educational practices, exhibiting a teaching proposal within the Creative Learning approach. The choice of conducting workshops using Scratch was based on the feasibility of teachers being able to work with this tool on different operating systems, which may or may not be installed on computers, used with or without internet, in addition to having a community with millions of users spread across Worldwide. Data collection took place through online questionnaires, literature review and dialogues carried out during the workshops. These instruments allowed the combination of quantitative and qualitative procedures. The theoretical basis addresses the use of technologies in the educational process; the knowledge that teachers need to build to use TDIC, through TPACK; Creative Learning and Scratch as resources that can produce contextualized and meaningful teaching for the student. We also sought to understand how technological mediation should happen in the teaching-learning process. As a result, there was positive acceptance by teachers to use Scratch as a complementary tool in the teaching process, however, this acceptance was conditioned to the provision of continuing education to help teachers in their difficulties for the pedagogical implementation of Scratch. It is recommended that the workshop be expanded to all SRE Uberaba teachers, allowing them to learn about and evaluate Scratch as a tool that aims to contribute to the teaching of different content and the construction of knowledge in different areas of knowledge.References
ACKERMANN, Edith. Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, v. 5, n. 3, p. 438, 2001. Disponível em: https://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2021.
ALVES, L. EDUCAÇÃO REMOTA: ENTRE A ILUSÃO E A REALIDADE. Interfaces Científicas - Educação, v. 8, n. 3, p. 348-365, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.set.edu.br/educacao/article/view/9251. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2021.
ALONSO, Katia Morosov. Tecnologias da informação e comunicação e formação de
professores: sobre rede e escolas. Educ. Soc., Campinas, vol. 29, n. 104 - Especial, p. 747-768, out. 2008.
ARAÚJO, Cláudia Helena Dos Santos. PROCESSOS DE MEDIAÇÃO PEDAGÓGICA NA DOCÊNCIA ONLINE. In: JORNADAS LATINO-AMERICANAS DE ESTUDOS SOCIAIS DA CIÊNCIA E DA TECNOLOGIA, 11., 2016. Curitiba. Anais eletrônicos [...], Curitiba: ESOCITE, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.esocite.la/curitiba-2016/. Acesso em: 01 jun. 2021.
BONILLA, Maria Helena Silveira. Software Livre e Educação: uma relação em construção. Perspectiva, v. 32, n. 1, p. 205-234, 2014.
BONILLA, Maria Helena; PRETTO, Nelson De Luca. Política educativa e cultura digital: entre práticas escolares e práticas sociais. Perspectiva, v. 33, n. 2, p. 499-521, 2015.
BURD, L. (2020). Prefácio à edição brasileira. Prefácio. Em M. Resnick, JARDIM DE INFÂNCIA PARA A VIDA TODA: por uma aprendizagem criativa, mão na massa e relevante para todos (pp. 15-17). Porto Alegre: Penso.
CIBOTTO, R. A. G.; OLIVEIRA, R. M. M. A. TPACK – Conhecimento tecnológico e pedagógico do conteúdo: uma revisão teórica. Imagens da Educação, v. 7, n. 2, p. 11-23, 7 jun. 2017.
DE ALMEIDA, José Luis Vieira; GRUBISICH, Teresa Maria. O ensino e a aprendizagem na sala de aula numa perspectiva dialética. Revista lusófona de educação, n. 17, p. 65-74, 2011.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2017. E-book.
GOMES, Helton. Como o Google quer fazer você esquecer do Zoom para videoconferências. Publicado em 29 de abril de 2020. Disponível em: https://www.uol.com.br/tilt/noticias/redacao/2020/04/29/como-o-google-quer-fazer-voce-esquecer-do-zoom-para-fazer-videoconferencias.htm. Acesso em: 08 abr. 2021.
HARRIS, Judith; MISHRA, Punya; KOEHLER, Matthew. Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of research on technology in education, v. 41, n. 4, p. 393-416, 2009.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS ANÍSIO TEIXEIRA. Microdados da Educação Básica 2020. Atualizado em 8 mar. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/inep/pt-br/areas-de-atuacao/pesquisas-estatisticas-e-indicadores/censo-escolar/resultados. Acesso em: 09 ago. 2021.
KENSKI, Vani Moreira. Educação e tecnologias: o novo ritmo da informação. 8.ed. Campinas, SP: Papirus, 2012.
KENSKI, Vani Moreira. Tecnologia e tempo docente. Campinas, SP: Papirus, 2013.
LAPER, Daniel. A Revolução das Coisas – Contexto nacional e global de IoT. [S. l.], 14 abr. 2020. Disponível em: https://abinc.org.br/a-revolucao-das-coisas-contexto-nacional-e-global-de-iot. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2021.
MINAS GERAIS. Secretaria de Estado de Educação. ENSINO MÉDIO EM TEMPO INTEGRAL. Belo Horizonte: SEE/MG, 2020. Disponível em: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B653VCN9RlaeQmVzQ3d4TmkxSlY2TlU0WWtHXzJjMGtiWEFv/view?resourcekey=0-eOMA-VhAXTnIYx3r70eFoQ. Acesso em: 3 jun. 2021.
MINAYO, M. C. S. (Org.). Pesquisa social. Teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2009.
MISHRA, Punya, KOEHLER, Matthew J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, v. 108, n. 6, p. 1017-1054, Jun. 2006.
MISHRA, Punya. The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. [S. l.], 10 set. 2018. Disponível em: https://punyamishra.com/2018/09/10/the-tpack-diagram-gets-an-upgrade/. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2021.
MORAN, J. M.; MASETTO, M. T.; BEHRENS, M. A. Novas tecnologias e mediação pedagógica. 21. ed. Campinas, SP: Papirus, 2013.
NAKASHIMA, Rosária Helena Ruiz; PICONEZ, Stela Conceição Bertholo. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): modelo explicativo da ação docente. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, v. 10, n. 3, p. 231-250, 2016.
PEIXOTO, J. Tecnologias e relações pedagógicas: a questão da mediação. Revista de Educação Pública, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 59/1, p. 367-379, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/educacaopublica/article/view/3681. Acesso em: 25 maio. 2021.
PEIXOTO, J.; CARVALHO, R. M. A. DE. MEDIAÇÃO PEDAGÓGICA MIDIATIZADA PELAS TECNOLOGIAS?. Teoria e Prática da Educação, v. 14, n. 1, p. 31-38, 2 jan. 2012.
REDE BRASILEIRA DE APRENDIZAGEM CRIATIVA. Sobre a RBAC. Brasil, 2020. Disponível em: https://aprendizagemcriativa.org/pt-br/sobre-rbac. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2021
RESNICK, Mitchel. GIVE P’S A CHANCE: PROJECTS, PEERS, PASSION, PLAY. In Constructionism and creativity: Proceedings of the Third International Constructionism Conference. Austrian Computer Society, Vienna (pp. 13-20), 2014. Disponível em: https://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/constructionism-2014.pdf. Acesso em: 03 jun. 2021.
RESNICK, Mitchel. JARDIM DE INFÂNCIA PARA A VIDA TODA: por uma aprendizagem criativa, mão na massa e relevante para todos. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2020.
RODEGHIERO, C. C.; SPEROTTO, R. I.; ÁVILA, C. M. O. Aprendizagem criativa e scratch: possibilidades metodológicas de inovação no ensino superior. Momento - Diálogos em Educação, [S. l.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 188–207, 2018.Disponível em: https://seer.furg.br/momento/article/view/7806. Acesso em: 3 jun. 2021.
RUSK, Natalie. Comece com Exploração, não com Explicação. [S. l.], 31 jan. 2019. Disponível em: https://sip.scratch.mit.edu/2019/01/31/start-with-exploration-not-explanation/. Acesso em: 2 abr. 2021.
SHULMAN, Lee S. Conhecimento e ensino: fundamentos para a nova reforma. Cadernos Cenpec| Nova série, v. 4, n. 2, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/293. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2021.
SHULMAN, Lee S. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review. v. 57, n. 1, p. 1-22, feb. 1987.
SHULMAN, Lee S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, v. 15, n.2, p. 4-14, 1986.
STECZ, Solange Straube. Transformações na educação - novas tecnologias, audiovisual e o mito do nativo digital. Travessias, Cascavel, v. 13, n. 1, p. 41-55, abr. 2019. ISSN 1982-5935. Disponível em: http://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/travessias/article/view/22129. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Thiago Oliveira Lemos, Hugo Leonardo Pereira Rufino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.