Using Miller's Pyramid in the Evaluation Process: An Integrative Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v18.n1.132-142Keywords:
Assessment, Teaching, Miller's PyramidAbstract
Introduction: The choice of assessment methods must take into account which approach best suits the competencies being measured. Miller's Pyramid is a conceptual model that can facilitate this choice. Objective: The main objective of this study is to clarify the use of Miller's Pyramid in the assessment of individuals, through an integrative literature review. Methodology: This article is an integrative literature review using the PICO strategy. The bibliographic survey was carried out on the CAPES Journals Portal, the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and SCOPUS (Elsevier). The descriptors chosen from the controlled vocabulary of the Brazilian Education Thesaurus were used in English, with the following combinations: “Miller's pyramid” AND assessment, “Miller's pyramid” AND learning and “Miller's pyramid” AND learning AND assessment. Results: 250 articles were initially found, of which 09 were chosen for this review. Conclusion: It was concluded that Miller's pyramid has the function of assisting in different studies, using its conceptual model that illustrates the cognitive and behavioral bases of professional practice with the need to assess skills and competencies, being of great interest in clinical areas. As a result, Miller's pyramid appears to be a promising tool for evaluation processes, given its different levels of competence, as it helps to ensure that future professionals not only master knowledge, but also know how to apply it in practice and are competent in their professional work.
References
Antunes, M., Bez, M., Perry, G., & Carvalho, M. J. S. (2020). Raciocínio clínico do estudante de Enfermagem: análise a partir de um simulador virtual. Revista Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 18(2), 306-315.
Bamadhaf, W. (2022). Oral Examination versus Simulation-Based Assessment in Assessing Patient Care Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents. Dubai Medical Journal, 5(4), 232-237.
Barragán-Brun, N., Martín-Álvarez, R., Bosch-Fontcuberta, J. M., Campíez-Navarro, M., Bóveda-Fontan, J., & Pérula-de-Torres, L. A. A. (2021) Impacto da formação em entrevista motivacional para médicos: desenho e avaliação de um Programa de Formação (MOTIVA). Atencion Primaria, 53(4), 101961.
Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2017). O valor da aprendizagem baseada em simulação na educação de enfermeiros por licenciatura: uma revisão e meta- análise do estado da arte. Educação de enfermeiras hoje, 27, 45-62.
Cronin, M. A., & George, E. (2023). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 168-192.
Iramaneerat, C., Thanapipatsiri, S., Noppartjamjomras, T. R., & Harnroongroj, T. (2023). The Relationship between Kolb Learning Style and Academic Performances in Orthopedic Residents. Siriraj Medical Journal, 75(5), 350-355.
Isola, M. L. (2020). Applying Millers Pyramid of Competence Assessment to an Online Health Informatics Curriculum. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(12).
Julthongpipat, K., Dumavibhat, C., Towashiraporn, K., & Patpituck, P. (2022). Development of Simulation Model for Transradial Catheterization Practice for Physicians. Siriraj Medical Journal, 74(9), 570-574.
Kane, J., Landes, M., Carroll, C., Nolen, A., & Sodhi, S. (2017). A systematic review of primary care models for non-communicable disease interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC family practice, 18, 1-12.
Hasani, H., Khoshnoodifar, M., Khavandegar, A., Ahmadi, S., Alijani, S., Mobedi, A., Tarani S., Vafadar B.,
Tajbakhsh R., Rezaei M., Parvari S., Shamsoddini S., & Silbert, D. I. (2021). Comparison of electronic versus conventional assessment methods in ophthalmology residents; a learner assessment scholarship study. BMC medical education, 21, 1-9.
Mendes, K. D. S., Silveira, R. C. D. C. P., & Galvão, C. M. (2008). Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & contexto-enfermagem, 17, 758-764.
Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic medicine, 65(9), S63-7.
Murudi-Manganye, N. S., Makhado, L., & Sehularo, L. A. (2023). A conceptual model to strengthen integrated management of HIV and NCDs among NIMART-trained nurses in Limpopo Province, South
Africa. Clinics and Practice, 13(2), 410-421.
Pereira, M. V., Boneli, S. M. D. S., Zimmer, R. O. D., & Ebert, S. L. F. (2020). Avaliação na educação superior: limites e possibilidades de uma experiência. Eccos Revista Científica, 55, 1-21.
Roussin, C., Sawyer, T., & Weinstock, P. (2020). Assessing competency using simulation: the SimZones approach. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(5), 262.
Santos, C. M. C., Pimenta, C. A. M., & Nobre, M. R. C. (2007). The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Revista Latino-americana De Enfermagem, 15(3), 508–511.
Saydullaevna, S. R. (2019). Significance of formulation of psycho-diagnostic competence in pedagogical activitieS. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 7(12).
Sim, J. H., Aziz, Y. F. A., Mansor, A., Vijayananthan, A., Foong, C. C., & Vadivelu, J. (2015). Students’ performance in the different clinical skills assessed in OSCE: what does it reveal?. Medical education online, 20(1), 26185.
Sousa, M. N. A.; Bezerra, A. L. D. & Egypto, I. A. S. (2023) Trilhando o caminho do conhecimento: o método de revisão integrativa para análise e síntese da literatura científica. Observatorio de la economía
latinoamericana, 21(10), 18448–18483
Sullivan, N., Swoboda, S. M., Breymier, T., Lucas, L., Sarasnick, J., Rutherford-Hemming, T., Budhathoki, C., & Kardong-Edgren, S. S. (2019). Emerging evidence toward a 2: 1 clinical to simulation ratio: A study comparing the traditional clinical and simulation settings. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 30, 34-41.
Smith, C. R., Vasilopoulos, T., Frantz, A. M., LeMaster, T., Martinez, R. A., Gunnett, A. M., & Fahy, B. G. (2023). Staying proper with your personal protective equipment: How to don and doff. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 86, 111057.
Witheridge, A., Ferns, G., & Scott-Smith, W. (2019). Revisiting Miller’s pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. International Journal of Medical Education, 10, 191.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Márcia Makaline Rodrigues Pereira , Maria Alice Araújo de Medeiros, Millena de Souza Alves, Mylena Medeiros Simões, Nara Maria Holanda de Medeiros , Elzenir Pereira de Oliveira Almeida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.