Patient safety from the perspective of the multiprofessional resident: The discourse of the collective subject
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v18.n3.872-883Keywords:
Patient safety, Quality of care, Multiprofessional residencyAbstract
The objective of this study is to understand the perception of multidisciplinary residents regarding their role in the development and applicability of patient safety principles. This is a qualitative study. We used the Collective Subject Discourse methodological framework to analyze the data, and key expressions and central ideas were extracted from the interviews to categorize the information. Five categories emerged: teamwork and safety culture, individual conduct, quality and safety, the resident's role, changes from the first to the second year of residency, and patient safety principles in professional life. The statements demonstrate that the participants understand patient safety and value continuing education, humanized care, and teamwork, providing elements that spark reflection on how these should be conducted in their training process.
References
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. (2020). Cultura de segurança do paciente. ANVISA.
Almeida, L., Marinho-Araujo, C. M., Amaral, A., & Dias, D. (2012). Democratização do acesso e do sucesso no ensino superior: Uma reflexão a partir das realidades de Portugal e do Brasil. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, 17(3), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772012000300014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772012000300014
Bohrer, C. D., Marques, L. G. S., Vasconcelos, R. O., Oliveira, J. L. C. de, Nicola, A. L., & Kawamoto, A. M. (2016). Comunicação e cultura de segurança do paciente no ambiente hospitalar: visão da equipe multiprofissional. Revista De Enfermagem Da UFSM, 6(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769219260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769219260
Buus, N., & Perron, A. (2020). The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 102, 103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103452
Dourado, L. F. (2011). Políticas e gestão da educação superior no Brasil: Múltiplas regulações e controle. Revista Brasileira de Política e Administração da Educação, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.21573/vol27n12011.19967
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/9728
Lefèvre, F. (2017). Discurso do sujeito coletivo: Nossos modos de pensar, nosso eu coletivo. Andreoli.
Lefèvre, F., & Lefèvre, A. M. (2012). Pesquisa de representação social: Um enfoque qualiquantitativo: A metodologia do discurso do sujeito coletivo. Líber Livro.
Martins, L. M., et al. (2020). Percepção de residentes multiprofissionais sobre segurança do paciente: uma revisão integrativa. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 44(4), e155.
Mesquita, D., Lima, R., Flores, M. A., Marinho-Araujo, C. M., & Rabelo, M. L. (2015). Industrial engineering and management curriculum profile. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6, 121–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2015-3-114
Ministério da Educação. (2003, 11 de março). Parecer nº 67, de 11 de março de 2003: Referencial para as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais - DCN dos Cursos de Graduação. MEC.
Oliveira Jr, P. F. P., Pacagnan,M.N; Marchiori, M (2013, maio). Contribuições da metodologia do discurso do sujeito coletivo (DSC) para investigação da estratégia como prática. In Anais do VI Encontro de Estudos em Estratégias (EnEO). ANPAD.
Organização Mundial da Saúde. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032705
Patient Safety Movement Foundation. (2020). Solução prática para segurança do paciente 1: Cultura de segurança. Patient Safety Movement Foundation. https://patientsafetymovement.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/APSS-1-Culture-of-Safety-Portuguese.pdf
Souza, A. C. M., et al. (2019). Segurança do paciente na formação dos profissionais de saúde: revisão integrativa. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 40, e20180186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180294
Tracy, S. J., & Hinrichs, M. M. (2017). Big Tent Criteria for qualitative quality. In J. Matthes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–10). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0016
Wachter, R. M. (2010). Compreendendo a segurança do paciente. Artmed.
Yoshikawa, J. M., Sousa, B. E. C., Peterlini, M. A. S., Kusahara, D. M., Pedreira, M. L. G., & Avelar, A. F. M. (2013). Compreensão de alunos de cursos de graduação em enfermagem e medicina sobre segurança do paciente. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 26(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002013000100005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002013000100005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Heloisa, Valéria, Leide, Gustavo, Elaine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.