How different academic fields perceive the problem of regulating emerging technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v19.n1.11-29Keywords:
disruptive technologies, ICT regulation, academy participation, discriminant analysis, public consultationAbstract
This research explores the experience and perceptions of researchers from Administration, Information Systems (IS), Law, and Sociology academic fields regarding regulating emerging Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Brazil. We conducted a discriminant analysis of a survey applied to 139 researchers, assessing their experiences, contributions, and perceptions of challenges and worldview of lawmakers and bureaucrats. The results indicate little difference between the areas. However, despite recognizing the importance of participation, actual involvement and contributions were low. The lack of interest in public consultations and hearings potentially undermines the effectiveness of regulations, highlighting the need for further investigation and alternative solutions to enhance engagement. The absence of the IS area can critically impact the development and enforcement of effective regulations, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration.
References
Aanestad, M., Kankanhalli, A., Maruping, L., Pang, M.-S., & Ram, S. (2021). Call for papers MISQ special issue on digital technologies and social justice. MIS Quarterly, 1–8. https://tinyurl.com/3fzk2sxe
Ada Lovelace Institute, & AI Now Institute and Open Government. (2021). Algorithmic accountability for the public sector (Number August). https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/algorithmic-accountability-public-sector.pdf
Arner, D. W., Buckley, R., Charamba, K., Zetzsche, D., & Sergeev, A. (2021). A Principles-based approach to the governance of BigFintechs. In Dialogue on Global Digital Finance Governance (3.3; Technical Paper). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3975099
Barclay, C. (2014). Using frugal innovations to support cybercrime legislations in small developing states: Introducing the cyber-legislation development and implementation process model (CyberLeg-DPM). Information Technology for Development, 20(2), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.841630
Bartz, D., & Culliford, E. (2021). Big Tech CEOs told ‘time for self- regulation is over’ by U. S. lawmakers. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/tech-ceos-back-capitol-hill-this-time-talk-about-misinformation-2021-03-25/
Baum, A., & Giussi, M. V. (2019). Irresistible: Change management for digital health. Tejerina, L., & Nelson, J. (Eds.). https://doi.org/10.18235/0001945
Beath, C., Berente, N., Gallivan, M. J., & Lyytinen, K. (2013). Expanding the frontiers of information systems research: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00330
Benvenisti, E. (2018). Upholding democracy amid the challenges of new technology: What role for the law of global governance? European Journal of International Law, 29(1), 9–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy013
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation (Project on Computational Propaganda). https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/reports/the-global-disinformation-order-2019-global-inventory-of-organised-social-media-manipulation/
Čas, J., Hert, P., Porcedda, M. G., & Raab, C. D. (2022). Introduction to the special issue: Questioning modern surveillance technologies: Ethical and legal challenges of emerging information and communication technologies. Information Polity, 27(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-229006
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17330451/
Ciriello, R. F. (2021). Tokenized index funds: A blockchain-based concept and a multidisciplinary research framework. International Journal of Information Management, 61(August), 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102400
Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. Frances Pinter (Publishers) Limited.
Coombs, C., Hislop, D., Taneva, S. K., & Barnard, S. (2020). The strategic impacts of intelligent automation for knowledge and service work: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(4), 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101600
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). (2022). Plataforma Sucupira: Cursos avaliados e reconhecidos. Ministério da Educação. Retrieved July 12, 2022 from https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/programa/quantitativos/quantitativoBuscaAvancada.jsf
Currie, W. L., & Seddon, J. J. J. M. (2022). Stakes, positions and logics: An institutional field analysis of cross-border health IT policy. Journal of Information Technology, 37(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211040513
Davison, R. M., Majchrzak, A., Hardin, A., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2023). Special issue on responsible IS research for a better world. In Information Systems Journal (Vol. 33, Number 1, pp. 1–7). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12405
Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mäntymäki, M., & Pappas, I. (2016). Call for papers special issue on: Responsible AI and analytics for an ethical and inclusive digitized society. Information Systems Frontiers. https://link.springer.com/collections/gbgdabfiie
Dennis, A., Galletta, D., & Webster, J. (2019). Special section on Fake News on the internet. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1222(May 2015), 1–39. https://www.jmis-web.org/cfps/JMIS_CFP_Fake_News_special_section.pdf
Eggers, W. D., & Turley, M. (2018). The future of regulation principles for regulating emerging technologies. https://bit.ly/3O78zWK
Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: A resource base and framework for it-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(1), 197–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043495
Estache, A., & Serebrisky, T. (2020). Updating infrastructure regulation for the 21st century in Latin America and the Caribbean (Number IDB Technical Note:1856). Inter-American Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002159
Fisher, J., & Harindranath, G. (2004). Regulation as a barrier to electronic commerce in Europe: The case of the European fund management industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000510
Floridi, L. (2021). Trump, Parler, and regulating the infosphere as our commons. Philosophy and Technology, 34(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00446-7
Friendly, M., Fox, J., & Monette, G. (2021). heplots: Visualizing tests in multivariate linear models (Version 1.3-9). R package. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.heplots
Galhardo, J. A. G., & Souza, C. A. (2024). Listening to regulators about the challenges in regulating emerging disruptive technologies. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2024-0073
Goldberg, K. B., Blumenthal, G. M., Mckee, A. E., & Pazdur, R. (2018). The FDA Oncology Center of Excellence and precision medicine. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 243, 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370217740861
Gozman, D., Butler, T., & Lyytinen, K. (2019). Call for papers for a special issue: Regulation in the age of digitalization. Journal of Information Technology, 1–5. https://tinyurl.com/zrdjwkfv
Hacker, P. (2018). Teaching fairness to Artificial Intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law. Common Market Law Review, 55(4), 1143–1185. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2018095
Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (Eighth Edition). Cengage.
HICSS Conference Office. (2022). Tracks & Minitracks: Organizational systems and technology. Retrieved January 20, 2022, from https://hicss.hawaii.edu/tracks-55/organizational-systems-and-technology/#strategy-information-technology-economics-and-society-sites-minitrack
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60419
Huang, Y., Chen, Y., & Tan, C. H. (2021). Regulating new digital market and its effects on the incumbent market: Investigation of online peer-to-peer short-term rental. Information and Management, 58(8), 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103544
IEEE. (2019). The IEEE global initiative on ethics of autonomous and intelligent systems. Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, First Edition. IEEE. https://bit.ly/3O0W6nk
ILO. (2021). World employment and social outlook: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/role-digital-labour-platforms-transforming-world-work
Inter-American Development Bank. (2018). Human Capital 2.0: The future of work in the Americas. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0001064
Jensen, S. (2019, June 13). The future of law making: Key note speech at the 11th OECD Conference on Measuring Regulatory Performance. Government.no. Retrieved September 5, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/25w6c49h
Jiang, J., & Cameron, A. F. (2020). It-enabled self-monitoring for chronic disease self-management: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 451–508. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/15108
Ketter, W., Peters, M., Collins, J., & Gupta, A. (2016). Competitive benchmarking: An IS research approach to address wicked problems with big data and analytics. MIS Quarterly, 40(4), 1057–1080. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.4.12
King, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (2019). Policy: An information systems frontier. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(6), 842–847. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00553
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State Press.
Lindman, J., Makinen, J., & Kasanen, E. (2022). Big Tech’s power, political corporate social responsibility, and regulation. Journal of Information Technology, 026839622211135. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962221113596
Maedche, A. (2017). Interview with Prof. Jeroen van den Hoven on “Why do ethics and values matter in Business and Information Systems Engineering?” In Business and Information Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0476-2
Mahieu, R., Eck, N. J. van, Putten, D. van, Hoven, J. van den. (2018). From dignity to security protocols: A scientometric analysis of digital ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9457-5
Melville, N. P., Robert, L., & Xiao, X. (2022). Putting humans back in the loop: An affordance conceptualization of the 4th industrial revolution. Information Systems Journal, (May 2021), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12422
Mökander, J., Axente, M., Casolari, F., & Floridi, L. (2022). Conformity assessments and post-market monitoring: A guide to the role of auditing in the proposed European AI regulation. Minds and Machines, 32(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09577-4
Müller, M., Neumann, J., & Kundisch, D. (2022). Peer-to-peer rentals, regulatory policies, and hosts’ cost pass-throughs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39(3), 834–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2096541
Nelson, J., Tejerina, L., Cafagna, G., & Ulrich, A. (2019). Social protection and health division’s approach to digital transformation: guidelines and recommendations. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001720
OECD. (2019). Regulatory effectiveness in the era of digitalisation (Number June). OECD Regulatory Policy Division. https://tinyurl.com/3zaw6343
OECD. (2020). Shaping the future of regulators: The impact of emerging technologies on economic regulators. In The Governance of Regulators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/db481aa3-en
Pagallo, U. (2012). Cracking down on autonomy: Three challenges to design in IT law. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9295-9
Pagallo, U. (2015). The realignment of the sources of the law and their meaning in an information society. Philosophy and Technology, 28(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0188-9
Palmerini, E., Azzarri, F., Battaglia, F., Bertolini, A., Carnevale, A., Carpaneto, J., Cavallo, F., Carlo, A. Di, Cempini, M., Controzzi, M., Koops, B.-J., Lucivero, F., Mukerji, N., Nocco, L., Pirni, A., Shah, H., Salvini, P., Schellekens, M., & Warwick, K. (2014). Regulating emerging robotic technologies in Europe: Robotics facing law and ethics. D6.2 - Guidelines on regulating robotics. RoboLaw.eu. Retrieved November 23, 2019, from http://www.robolaw.eu/RoboLaw_files/documents/robolaw_d6.2_guidelinesregulatingrobotics_20140922.pdf
Pelizza, A. (2021). Towards a sociomaterial approach to inter-organizational boundaries: How information systems elicit relevant knowledge in government outsourcing. Journal of Information Technology, 36(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220934490
Puron-Cid, G. (2013). Interdisciplinary application of structuration theory for e-government: A case study of an IT-enabled budget reform. Government Information Quarterly, 30(SUPPL. 1), S46–S58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.010
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). The Future of the study of Public Administration: Embedding research object and methodology in epistemology and ontology. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02433.x
Roca, J. B. (2024). Regulatory agencies as innovation enablers: A conceptualization. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae049
Roca, J. B., & O’Sullivan, E. (2022). The role of regulators in mitigating uncertainty within the Valley of Death. Technovation, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102157
Rossi, M., Cheung, C. M. K., Sarker, S., & Thatcher, J. B. (2019). Call for papers for a special issue: Ethical issues and unintended consequences of digitalization and platformization. Journal of Information Technology, CFP-Spec, 1–3. https://tinyurl.com/46vnw3jx
Sawyer, S., & Winter, S. J. (2011). Special issue on futures for research on information systems: Prometheus unbound. Journal of Information Technology, 26(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.7
Schuelke-Leech, B. A., Jordan, S. R., & Barry, B. (2019). Regulating autonomy: An assessment of policy language for highly automated vehicles. Review of Policy Research, 36(4), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12332
Schulz, W., & Held, T. (2005). Regulated Self-Regulation as a form of modern government: A comparative analysis with case studies from media and telecommunications law. John Libbey Publishing.
Serna, E. M. (2015). Maturity model of transdisciplinary knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 35(6), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.07.002
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989–1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970
Souter, D., Spuy, A. van der, & UNESCO. (2019). UNESCO’s internet universality indicators: A framework for assessing internet development. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367617.locale=en
Taeihagh, A., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2021). Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies. Regulation and Governance, 15(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12392
Tarafdar, M., & Davison, R. M. (2018). Research in information systems: Intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary approaches. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(6), 523–551. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00500
Trakman, L., Walters, R., & Zeller, B. (2019). Is privacy and personal data set to become the new intellectual property? IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 50(8), 937–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00859-0
UNESCO. (2023). Safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information: guidelines for a multistakeholder approach in the context of regulating digital platforms. Internet for Trust - Towards Guidelines for Regulating Digital Platforms for Information as a Public Good, (April), 1–32. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384031.locale=en
UNESCO. Information for All Programme (IFAP). (2007). Ethical implications of emerging technologies: a survey (Boyan Radoykov, Ed.). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000149992.locale=en
Vaidya, K., & Campbell, J. (2016). Multidisciplinary approach to defining public e-procurement and evaluating its impact on procurement efficiency. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9536-z
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (Version 7.3-51.4; Fourth). Springer. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/
Vogelsang, I. (2017). Regulatory inertia versus ICT dynamics: The case of product innovations. Telecommunications Policy, 41(10), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.09.006
Wasilow, S., & Thorpe, J. B. (2019). Artificial intelligence, robotics, ethics, and the military: A Canadian perspective. AI Magazine, 40(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i1.2848
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
Whitford, A. B., & Anderson, D. (2021). Governance landscapes for emerging technologies: The case of cryptocurrencies. Regulation and Governance, 15(4), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12366
World Bank. (2019). Information and communications for development 2018: Data-driven development. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1325-2
World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1600-0
Zhang, L., & Bruun, N. (2017). Legal transplantation of intellectual property rights in China: Resistance, adaptation and reconciliation. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48(1), 4–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0542-1
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 José Antonio Galhardo, Cesar Alexandre Souza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.