Principles for Planning and Construction of Hybrid Teaching Models:

a proposal under development

Authors

  • Gianna Oliveira Roque PUC-Rio
  • Ana Luiza Ferreira Portes Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n3.597-616

Keywords:

Hybrid teaching, Higher education, pedagogical strategies, lesson planning

Abstract

This paper discusses the principles and foundations that serve as the basis for a hybrid teaching approach which is driving the increased interest in this modality. The work aims to identify which models are being used by Higher Education Institutions to support the planning of hybrid courses that could be adapted and applied in other educational contexts. It was identified as a result, that the interest in hybrid teaching stems from: I) the potential of new communication technologies for teaching; II) the increase of online courses offer; III) the possibility of offering part of in person courses workload through distance learning; IV) the changes brought about by the pandemic attributed to the Emergency Remote Teaching (ERE) measures. As a theoretical foundation, it was observed that in recent years, innovative approaches to learning in Higher Education are being based on a constructivist perspective that has the investigation process as a central element. Two (2) models were also identified that served as the basis for a proposal of a platform, under development, to support the planning of hybrid classes and courses that lead students to actively engage in their learning process.

References

ABED – ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE EDUCAÇÃO A DISTÂNCIA. Censo EAD.BR: relatório analítico da aprendizagem a distância no Brasil. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil, 2020. Disponível em: https://abed.org.br/arquivos/CENSO_EAD_2020_PORTUGUES.pdf.

ANTHONEY, M., JACOBSON, J., SNARE, J. Innovating with Purpose: The Blended Flow Toolkit for Designing Blended/Hybrid Courses. EDUCAUSE, 2018. Disponível em: https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2018/1/elib1801.pdf.

BACICH, Lilian. Inovação na educação, 2020. Disponível em: https://lilianbacich.com/2020/06/06/ensino-hibrido-muito-mais-do-que-unir-aulas-presenciais-e-remotas/. Acessado em 28/01/2022.

BLENDED FLOW TOOLKIT. A Resource for Faculty Designing Hybrid and Blended Courses. The Center for Digital Learning & Innovation, Seattle University. Disponível em: https://cdlihosting.com/blendedflow/pdf/Hybrid-Blended-Flow-Toolkit.pdf.

BRASIL. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep). Censo da Educação Superior 2021: notas estatísticas. Brasília, DF: Inep, 2022. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/estatisticas_e_indicadores/notas_estatisticas_censo_da_educacao_superior_2021.pdf

CASTAÑON, A. G. Construtivismo e ciências humanas. Ciências & Cognição, Vol 5: 36-49, 2005. Disponível em: http://cienciasecognicao.org/revista/index.php/cec/article/view/523

CHRISTENSEN, C., HORN, M., STAKER, H. Ensino Híbrido: uma Inovação Disruptiva? Uma introdução à teoria dos híbridos. Clayton Christensen Institute, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/ensino-hibrido/

FERNANDES, Arlete M.M.; MARINHO, Gisanne de O.; BATISTA, Miriam D.; OLIVEIRA, Gislene F. O Construtivismo na Educação. Id on Line Rev.Mult. Psic., 2018, vol.12, n.40, p.138-150. ISSN: 1981-1179. Disponível em: https://idonline.emnuvens.com.br/id/article/view/1049.

GARRISON, R., VAUGHAN, N. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

GARTNER. Top Technology Trends Impacting Higher Education in 2021. Disponível em: https://emtemp.gcom.cloud/ngw/globalassets/en/information-technology/documents/trends/742584-top-technology-trends-impacting-higher-education-in-2021.pdf

GEBERA, O. T., Perspectiva de la Convergencia Pedagógica y Tecnológica en la modalidad Blended-Learning. En Revista Educación. Departamento de Educación PUCP. Vol. 23, N° 44, março-agosto 2014, pp. 67-87 / ISSN 1019-9403.

HENZ, Celso I.; SANTOS, Cláudia A. dos; SIGNOR, Patrícia. Experiência e movimento: pensando a educação em Dewey. Espaço Pedagógico, v. 25, n 1, p. 140-152, jan./abr., 2018. Disponível em: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rep/article/view/8036

HORN, M., STAKER, H. Blended: usando a inovação disruptiva para aprimorar a educação. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2015.

MITRE, Sandra Minardi et. al. Metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagem na formação profissional em saúde: debates atuais. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [online]. 2008, vol.13, suppl.2, pp.2133-2144. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232008000900018.

ZANATTA, Beatriz Aparecida. O legado de Pestalozzi, Herbart e Dewey para as práticas pedagógicas escolares. Rev. Teoria e Prática da Educação, v. 15, n. 1, p. 105-112, jan./abr. 2012. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/18569

Published

2023-09-23

Issue

Section

Article