The art-technologies use by teachers of foreign languages in the educational environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n3.768-777Keywords:
art-technology, foreign language teacher, application, early stage, cloud-method, cognitive linguisticsAbstract
Recently there has been an increased interest in the use of cognitive linguistics in the context of teaching foreign languages. The study Purpose is to develop authors’ methods in the field of art technology at an early stage of learning. Qualitative approach is used in developing authors’ methods in the field of art technology: in one-to-one interview, of observation, conversational communication. Given the results, the methods for working with Ch. Burton Barber's picture "Off to school" in the process of learning a foreign language at an early stage of training, aimed at shaping practical skills in forming communication competences, forming skills of intercultural development. A positive dynamic in using art- technologies in the process of learning a foreign language in 2018-2021 years is indicated. The use of art technologies was noted: the creation of motivations for students of a foreign language to actively express themselves and to comprehend new forms of work; formation of the process of perception, attention, thinking, speech, working with creative material, implementation of inter-subject connections; developing students' autonomy with ways of expressing themselves; informal atmosphere.References
Achaeva M.S. (2021). Lexico-educational nest: cognitive approach (on the example of English and Russian languages). Modern problems of philology and methods of teaching languages: issues of theory and practice: a collection of scientific works, 27-29.
Achaeva M.S., & Pospelova N.V., Subbotina, N.S. (2019). Parametric Adjectives of Russian and English as Repre-sentatives of the Category of Space. XLinguae, 12 (3), 12-21.
Alexeyeva, M. (2007). Development of creative thinking of junior schoolchildren by means of art therapy (on the material of learning a foreign language). Kursk: Kursk State University
Alzubi, A. (2019). Teachers’ Perceptions on Using Smartphones in English as a Foreign Language Context. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 4(1), 92-104. https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/399
Arslan, C., & Tanis, B.M. (2018). Building English Vocabulary Schema Retention Using Review Value Calculation for ESL Students. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(3), 116-134.
Balganova, E. (2021). Digitalization Trends and Risks Professional Education. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-19-31
Bespalko, V.P. (1989). Related Educational Technology. Moscow: Prosveshenie.
Brigas, C. (2019). Modeling and Simulation in an Educational Context: Teaching and Learning Sciences. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 4(2), 1-12.
Brownell, C., & Rashid, A. (2020). Building Bridges Instead of Walls: Engaging Young Children in Critical Literacy Read Alouds. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 2(1), 76-94. https://curriculumstudies.org/index.php/CS/article/view/35
Clarke, M.A. (2005). Creativity in modern foreign languages teaching and learning. Subject Perspectives on Creativity in Higher Education Working Paper. Heslington: Higher Education Academy.
Etherington, M. (2019). The Challenge with Educational Transformation. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 2(1), 96-112.
Frolova, G., & Bozhkova, G., Bykov, A. (2019). Activities and projects aimed to promote reading in Yelabuga (the Republic of Tatarstan) and Pilsen (the Czech Republic). Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 337-356. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43227982&ysclid=lef9gkyfyg898695555
Fromm, E. (2019). Mental health and society. Moscow: AST.
Garnov, A.P., & Garnova, V.Y., Prodanova, N.A., Khudyakov, S.V., & Zatsarinnaya, E.I. (2020). Digitalization of the economy: Problems and prospects. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 442-444. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43286982&ysclid=lef9ejs3st887001405
Gluhova, T.G. (2004). Art Therapy. Methodical recommendations. Samara: Agni Publishing House.
Gorovaya, M.M., Khanmurzina, R.R., Malakhova, L.A., Tagirova, N.P., Saenko, N.R., Shnyakina, E.Y., & Zatsepina, M.B. (2017). Didactic principles of university information educational systems designing. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(7), 1201-1210.
Grehova, A.V. (1967). Pedagogical opportunities to use art therapy elements in art classes in high school. Moscow: Nauka.
Howatt, A.P. (1986). History of English Language Teaching. Glottodidactica, 16, 132-137.
Humbatova, S.I., & Hajiyev, N.G. (2019). The role of spending on education and science in sustainable development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1704-1727.
Ivanchenko, T.Y. (2013). Cross Cultural Communication and Creativity in Foreign Languages Teaching and Learning. In Молодой ученый. 4(51), 561-564. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18932799&ysclid=lef9d71pm832705863
Johnson, C., & Hinton, H. (2019). Toward a Brilliant Diversity. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 2(1), 56-70.
Kiselyova, M.V. (2006). Art Therapy in Working with Children. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Press.
Kopytin, A.I. (2001). Systemic Art Therapy. St. Petersburg: Kogito Center.
Kopytin, A.I., & Svistovskaya E.E. (2007). Art Therapy for Children and Adolescents. St. Petersburg: Cogoto Center.
Korableva, O., & Durand, T., Kalimullina, O., Stepanova, I. (2019). Usability testing of MOOC: Identifying user interface problems. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2, 468-475.
Korotaeva, E.V., & Andryunina, A.S. (2019). Cognitive pedagogy of the second half of the twentieth century: Retrospective analysis. Modern problems of science and education. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39251242&ysclid=lef9blhypx198489082
Kulikova, T. (2021). Interconnection of Time Competence and Stress Resistance of Teachers with Different Work Experience. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-86-105
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan Publ. 209-212.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Pogosyan, V. G. (2021). Systemic approach in phenomenon research (a historiographic etude). Voprosy Istorii, 2021(4_2), 253-265. doi:10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202104Statyi62
Richards, J.C., & Farrrel, T.S.C. (2010). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for Teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (2002). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saenko, N., & Voronkova, O., Volk, M., & Voroshilova, O. (2019). The social responsibility of a scientist: Philosophical aspect of contemporary discussions. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 332-345.
Shmalko, Y., & Rudakova, O. (2021). Language Barrier as a Result of Rummination in the Contaxt of Distance Learning. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-74-85
Skrebtsova, T.G. (2018). Cognitive linguistics thirty years later. In Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература (pp. 465-480), Санкт-Петербург, Россия. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36368544&ysclid=lef8dm5q10625970035
Sturm, E., & Quaynor, L. (2020). A Window, Mirror, and Wall: How Educators Use Twitter for Professional Learning. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(1), 22-44.
Torrance, E.P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20026936
Torrance, E.P., & Myers, R.E. (1967). Education and the Creative Potential. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. N.Y.: Routledge Publ.
Vural, H. (2019). The Relationship of Personality Traits with English Speaking Anxiety. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 1(1), 55-74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nadezda Pospelova, Marina Achaeva, Natalya Subbotina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.