Innovation of teaching methods of physical education for students at universities in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse2.46-56Keywords:
method innovation, physical education, teaching, quality of education at universitiesAbstract
The form of teaching organization and teaching methods play a very important role. It greatly influences the quality and effectiveness of students' physical education studies in universities in Vietnam. In this article, the author focuses on researching and proposing necessary changes in teaching Physical Education at universities in Vietnam.The article emphasizes the importance of improving teaching methods to optimize the learning experience and comprehensive development of students. The author useed the interview method to conduct detailed interviews with students and lecturers to better understand their perspectives and experiences in teaching and learning physical education. Results show that innovating methods of teaching Physical Education for students at universities in Vietnam is an important factor for the comprehensive development of students and the education system in general. According to the results we can say that to achieve these goals, close cooperation is needed between stakeholders, including lecturers, students, school administrators and the social community.References
Abd Rahman, H., Khalid, Z. M., Ismail, N. M., Kamisan, N. A. B., Norrulashikin, S. M., Nor, S. R. M., ... & Hamdan, M. F. (2022). Statistical Analysis on Students’ Evaluation and Students’ Final Exam Marks in Undergraduate Mathematical Courses at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 27(1), 1-8. https://akademiabaru.com/submit/index.php/frle/article/view/4513
Amida, A., Herbert, M. J., Omojiba, M., & Stupnisky, R. (2022). Testing and exploring the predictors of faculty motivation to use learning analytics to enhance teaching effectiveness. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(2), 545-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09309-2
Andres, H. (2020), "The role of active teaching, academic self-efficacy, and learning behaviors in student performance", Journal of International Education in Business, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-02-2020-0017
Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual reality as pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: a systematic literature review. Education Research International, 2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623
Cheung, P. (2020). Teachers as role models for physical activity: Are preschool children more active when their teachers are active?. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19835240
Cilliers, E. J. (2021, January). Reflecting on social learning tools to enhance the teaching-learning experience of generation Z learners. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 5, p. 606533). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.606533
Dung, V.V., Hoa, L.M., Quyet, L.V (2023). The Contribution of Ho Chi Minh in Building the Ideas of Vietnamese Today Students. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0016
Dung, V. V., Minh, T. N. ., & Dinh, D. Q. . (2023). A influência da alienação do trabalho no desenvolvimento sustentável no vietnã a partir de uma perspectiva filosófica de Karl Marx. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 16(1), 212–226. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2897
Ferreira, M., Martinsone, B., & Talić, S. (2020). Promoting sustainable social emotional learning at school through relationship-centered learning environment, teaching methods and formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0003
Fromm, J., Radianti, J., Wehking, C., Stieglitz, S., Majchrzak, T. A., & vom Brocke, J. (2021). More than experience?-On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. The Internet and higher education, 50, 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100804
García-Rico, L., Martínez-Muñoz, L. F., Santos-Pastor, M. L., & Chiva-Bartoll, O. (2021). Service-learning in physical education teacher education: A pedagogical model towards sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(4), 747-765.
Gao, M., Zhang, Z., Yu, G., Arık, S. Ö., Davis, L. S., & Pfister, T. (2020). Consistency-based semi-supervised active learning: Towards minimizing labeling cost. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part X 16 (pp. 510-526). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58607-2_30
Guerrero-Romera, C., Sánchez-Ibáñez, R., Escribano-Miralles, A., & Vivas-Moreno, V. (2021). Active Garzón Artacho, E., Martínez, T. S., Ortega Martin, J. L., Marin Marin, J. A., & Gomez Garcia, G. (2020). Teacher training in lifelong learning—The importance of digital competence in the encouragement of teaching innovation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852
Jdaitawi, M. (2020). Does Flipped Learning Promote Positive Emotions in Science Education? A Comparison between Traditional and Flipped Classroom Approaches. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 18(6), 516-524.
Long, C. S., Ibrahim, Z., & Kowang, T. O. (2014). An Analysis on the Relationship between Lecturers' Competencies and Students' Satisfaction. International Education Studies, 7(1), 37-46.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2020). Training learning strategies to promote self-regulation and transfer: The knowledge, belief, commitment, and planning framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1363-1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620920723
McEnroe-Petitte, D., & Farris, C. (2020). Using gaming as an active teaching strategy in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.09.002
Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive learning environments, 28(8), 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
Motta, V. F., & Galina, S. V. R. (2023). Experiential learning in entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103919
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1-4. ttps://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
Noori, A. Q., Said, H., Nor, F. M., & Abd Ghani, F. (2020). The relationship between university lecturers' behaviour and students' motivation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11C), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082303
Phuong, V. T. (2023). Factors Affecting the Learning of English Proverbs and Idioms of English-Majored Students at University of Khanh Hoa, Vietnam. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 35-47. https://ejal.info/article-view/?id=442
Phuong, V. T., & Phuong, N. T. P. (2023). High school students'perceptions of learning English vocabulary through games. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 15(38). https://doi.org /10.18316/rcd.v15i38.11043
Phuong, V. T., & Nguyen, N. D. (2023). Aprimoramento das habilidades de leitura e formação: um estudo na Universidade de Khanh Hoa. Educ. Form., 8, e11367. https://doi.org/10.25053/redufor.v8.e11367
Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. (2021). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Reality, 25, 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
Uleanya, C. (2020). Exploring effects of lecturers–students’ relationship on students academic performances in selected rural universities. Interchange, 51, 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-019-09377-x
Vo Tu Phuong. (2023). A Study of Oxymoron in English and its Values for Teaching English-Majored Students. (2023). Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(4), 76. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0091
Watanabe, E., Ozeki, T., & Kohama, T. (2018, March). Analysis of interactions between lecturers and students. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 370-374). https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170360
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Phan Thanh My
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.