The role of family education in enhancing gender equality in Vietnam

Authors

  • Duong Thi Tuoi Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics, 135 Nguyen Phong Sac - Nghia Tan - Cau Giay - Ha Noi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse2.121-133

Keywords:

role of family, present gender equality, Vietnam

Abstract

Gender equality is a very important issue of concern to the whole world. If the issue of women's liberation is the most basic issue among women's struggles, then equality between men and women is considered the most important and core content of this issue. The family is the place where gender issues are socialized and gender knowledge and skills are passed on. In this article, the author will focus on clarifying issues such as: the role of education; propaganda role to raise awareness; the role of division of labor according to gender; Conditions to promote gender equality from family. Through research, the author will provide opinions for discussion and open up future research directions.

References

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). An empirical study of employees’ motivation and its influence job satisfaction. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G. (2021). An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and its Influence Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.2.3

Allen, K. R. (2023). Feminist theory, method, and praxis: Toward a critical consciousness for family and close relationship scholars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 899-936. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211065779

Ares, M., & van Ditmars, M. M. (2023). Intergenerational social mobility, political socialization and support for the left under post-industrial realignment. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 536-554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000230

Benner, A. D., & Mistry, R. S. (2020). Child development during the COVID‐19 pandemic through a life course theory lens. Child development perspectives, 14(4), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12387

Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(49), 31063-31069. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117

Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of neuroscience research, 99(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631

Cortez, R. M., & Johnston, W. J. (2020). The Coronavirus crisis in B2B settings: Crisis uniqueness and managerial implications based on social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.004

Crivello, G., & Morrow, V. (2020). Against the odds: Why some children fare well in the face of adversity. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(5), 999-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1626837

Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., Von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., ... & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological economics, 179, 106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824

Dung, V. V., Minh, T. N. ., & Dinh, D. Q. . (2023). A influência da alienação do trabalho no desenvolvimento sustentável no Vietnã a partir de uma perspectiva filosófica de Karl Marx. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 16(1), 212–226. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2897

Eden, L., & Wagstaff, M. F. (2021). Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00054-w

Ehmer, J., & Lentz, C. (2023). Work and the Life Course in a Global and Multidisciplinary Perspective: An. Life Course, Work, and Labour in Global History, 18, 1.

Gazzotti, P., Emmerling, J., Marangoni, G., Castelletti, A., Wijst, K. I. V. D., Hof, A., & Tavoni, M. (2021). Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23613-y

Griffin, T., & Glover, T. D. (2023). The development of social and cultural capitals for immigrant hosts of VFR travellers. Leisure Sciences, 45(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1817201

Guhin, J., Calarco, J. M., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2021). Whatever happened to socialization? Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-103012

Koburtay, T., Syed, J., & Haloub, R. (2020). Implications of religion, culture, and legislation for gender equality at work: Qualitative insights from Jordan. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4036-6

Koster, T., Poortman, A. R., van der Lippe, T., & Kleingeld, P. (2022). Fairness perceptions of the division of household labor: Housework and childcare. Journal of Family Issues, 43(3), 679-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X219938

Kurowska, A. (2020). Gendered effects of home-based work on parents’ capability to balance work with non-work: Two countries with different models of division of labour compared. Social indicators research, 151(2), 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2034-9

Lawless, M. T., Tieu, M., Golley, R., & Kitson, A. (2024). How and where does “care” fit within seminal life‐course approaches? A narrative review and critical analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 80(3), 871-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15852

Manning, J. (2021). Decolonial feminist theory: Embracing the gendered colonial difference in management and organisation studies. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(4), 1203-1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12673

Marsh, J. (2023). Living on the Edge: An American Generation's Journey through the 20th Century by Richard A. Setterstein Jr. Glen H. Elder Jr., and Lisa D. Pierce. American Literary History, 35(1), 606-609.

Meira, J. V. D. S., & Hancer, M. (2021). Using the social exchange theory to explore the employee-organization relationship in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(2), 670-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2020-0538

Murtaz, M. (2021). Cultural capital and academic achievement: a study based on government primary school students (Doctoral dissertation, Brac University). http://hdl.handle.net/10361/15623

Ormerod, R. (2020). The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(12), 1873-1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590

Phillips, L. T., Tepper, S., Goya-Tocchetto, D., Davidai, S., Ordabayeva, N., Mirza, M. U., ... & Jachimowicz, J. (2020). Inequality in people's minds. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vawh9

Raturi, S., & Rastogi, S. (2022). Juvenile delinquency and legal aspects: Indian scenario. International Journal of Health Sciences, (I), 12297-12304. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8076

Rosenfeld, D., & Ramirez-Valles, J. (2024). Beyond identity and generations: bringing life course theory to studies of older gay men. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1393607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1393607

Samtleben, C., & Müller, K. U. (2022). Care and careers: Gender (in) equality in unpaid care, housework and employment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 77, 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100659

Schneider, N. F., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2021). Introduction: The sociology of the family–towards a European perspective. In Research handbook on the sociology of the family (pp. 2-20). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00007

Sciortino, G. (2021). A blueprint for inclusion: Talcott Parsons, the societal community and the future of universalistic solidarities. The American Sociologist, 52(1), 159-177. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09470-0

Sullivan, O. (2021). The gender division of housework and childcare. In Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family (pp. 342-354). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00033

Thomas, A., & Gupta, V. (2021). Social capital theory, social exchange theory, social cognitive theory, financial literacy, and the role of knowledge sharing as a moderator in enhancing financial well-being: from bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 664638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638

Van Dung, V. (2022). The Unity between Politics and Moral Education in the View of the Philosophers of Xian Qin Confucian. (2022). Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(4), 258. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0111

Van Dung, V. (2023). “Dialectical thought” in “The Five Elements Theory” in ancient China. Argumentos n. 29 (2023). http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/81373

Van Raalte, A. A., Klüsener, S., Oksuzyan, A., & Grigoriev, P. (2020). Declining regional disparities in mortality in the context of persisting large inequalities in economic conditions: the case of Germany. International journal of epidemiology, 49(2), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz265

Vo Van Dung, & Luu Mai Hoa. (2023). Theoretical perspectives of the view of human in the Confucian philosophy in pre qin dynasty. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 15(2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2021.4022

Waddell, N., Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., & Hammond, M. D. (2021). Gendered division of labor during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for relationship problems and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1759-1781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996476

Walker, J., Selous, A., & Misca, G. (2020). Living in our shoes: Understanding the needs of UK armed forces families. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/living-.

Wasilah, S. (2023). Education in a Functional Structural Perspective and Conflict Regarding Social Relations in Society. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 8(3), 902-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5922

Whelan, M., McGillivray, J., & Rinehart, N. J. (2023). Using life course theory to explore the association between autistic traits, child, family, and school factors and the successful transition to secondary school. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05845-z

Yang, Q., Li, S., Cui, H., & Qiao, J. (2023). How does supplier relationship management affect supplier innovation contribution? Interorganizational learning and social exchange theory integrated perspectives. Industrial Marketing Management, 114, 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.08.003

Zerbe Enns, C., Díaz, L. C., & Bryant-Davis, T. (2021). Transnational feminist theory and practice: An introduction. Women & Therapy, 44(1-2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1774997

Zhao, L., & Detlor, B. (2023). Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1866444

Downloads

Published

2024-07-24

Issue

Vol. 17 No. se2 (2024)

Section

Community Empowerment through Education, Technology and Infrastructure

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Duong Thi Tuoi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.