Measurement of ambivalent sexist attitudes in relation to women in higher education institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.n1.89-96Abstract
This work aimed to measure the level of sexism among students and employees of higher education institutions. Sexism stems from the stereotypes and prejudices suffered by women, but not as the distinction between men. In this study, a sample of one hundred and forty-one university students and collaborators from these institutions. A survey took place on the premises of three higher education institutions, during the transit of people on the premises, where they were randomly approached to answer questions or questionnaires, the data being published with statistical programs. As the main results show the existence of sexism among women, the figures presented show the biggest sexists of those who did not study and the singles and the youngest are more prejudiced.References
BELO, Raquel Pereira et al. Correlatos valorativos do sexismo ambivalente. Psicologia: Reflexão e CrÃtica, v. 18, n. 1, p. 7-15, 2005.
CÁRDENAS, Manuel et al. Inventario de sexismo ambivalente: adaptación, validación y relación con variables psicosociales. Salud & Sociedad, v. 1, n. 2, p. 125-135, 2010.
COSTA, Pedro Alexandre et al. Adaptação dos inventários de sexismo moderno para Portugal: o inventário de sexismo ambivalente e o inventário de ambivalência em relação aos homens. Psicologia: Reflexão e crÃtica, v. 28, n. 1, p. 126-135, 2015.
DÍAZ-LOVING, Rolando; GONZÁLEZ-RIVERA, Ilse; BAEZA-RIVERA, MarÃa José. Sexismo. Enseñanza e Investigación en PsicologÃa, v. 1, n. 3, p. 287· 293-287· 293, 2019.
EXPÓSITO, Francisca; MOYA, Miguel C.; GLICK, Peter. Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos. Revista de PsicologÃa social, v. 13, n. 2, p. 159-169, 1998.
FERNÁNDEZ, MarÃa Lameiras; CASTRO, Yolanda RodrÃguez. Evaluación del sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes gallegos. Acción psicológica, v. 2, n. 2, p. 131, 2003.
FERNÁNDEZ, Sandra; GALLEGOS, Walter L. Arias; ALVARADO, Massiel. La escala de sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes de dos universidades de Arequipa. Avances en PsicologÃa, v. 25, n. 1, p. 85-96, 2017.
FORMIGA, Nilton S.; GOLVEIA, Valdiney V.; SANTOS, Maria Neusa dos. Inventário de sexismo ambivalente: sua adaptação e relação com o gênero. Psicologia em estudo, v. 7, n. 1, p. 103-111, 2002.
FORMIGA, Nilton Soares et al. As duas faces do preconceito feminino: Análise do inventário de sexismo ambivalente em homens brasileiros. Psicologia Argumento, v. 23, n. 41, p. 57-63, 2005.
GLICK, Peter; FISKE, Susan T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. V. 70, P. 491-512, 1996.
GLICK, Peter; FISKE, Susan T. Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, v. 21, n. 1, p. 119-135, 1997.
GLICK, Peter; FISKE, Susan T. Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of women quarterly, v. 35, n. 3, p. 530-535, 2011.
GUERRA, Valeschka et al. Inventário de ambivalência em relação aos homens: adaptação brasileira e relação com o gênero. Revista Psicologia-Teoria e Prática, v. 6, n. 2, 2004.
HAIR, Joseph F. et al. Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora, 2009.
MESQUITA FILHO, Marcos; EUFRÁSIO, Cremilda; BATISTA, Marcos Antônio. Estereótipos de gênero e sexismo ambivalente em adolescentes masculinos de 12 a 16 anos. Saúde e Sociedade, v. 20, n. 3, p. 554-567, 2011.
OLIVEIRA, Maxwell Ferreira. Metodologia cientÃfica: um manual para a realização de pesquisas em Administração. Universidade Federal de Goiás. Catalão, 2011.
PLOUS, Scott. The psychology of prejudice, sterotyping, and discrimination: An overview. 2003.
SALES-OLIVEIRA, Catarina; VILLAS-BOAS, Susana; LAS-HERAS, Soledad. Estereótipos de género e sexismo em docentes do ensino superior. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior, v. 7, n. 19, p. 22-41, 2016.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. The global gender gap report. Genebra, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.