The impact of ESG principles on the company's profit

Authors

  • Natalia Prodanova Plekhanov Russian University of Economics Moscow, Russia
  • Olga Tarasova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n3.685-696

Keywords:

ESG financial impact, ESG integration, sustainable development, corporate social responsibility, corporate sustainability

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of including ESG factors in strategies that support sustainable development. The study seeks to determine the links between ESG performance in the environment, society, and corporate governance and profitability. An essential element uncovered in the article is the investigation into the causality of this connection. The paper focuses on refining the assessment of the aforementioned link. The article examines the impact of ESG investments, considering the increasing worldwide usage of responsible investment practices, sustainability initiatives, and safe production methods. They not only establish the theoretical foundation for their study but also illustrate the conclusions with concrete data sourced from the reports of the examined company. Theoretical analysis of scientific methods involving analysis, synthesis, and generalization of existing literature are utilized. Additionally, quantitative methods were utilized, which encompassed statistical analysis of data derived from the final and annual reports of PJSC Tatneft. The study results provide invaluable insights indicating that adhering to ESG principles directly influences a company's revenue, particularly for enterprises engaged in profitable yet environmentally hazardous activities.

References

Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409-1428.

Aras, G., Aybars, A., & Kutlu, O. (2010). Managing corporate performance: Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets. International Journal of productivity and Performance management, 59(3), 229-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011023573.

Bataeva, B. S. (2018). Stakeholder Engagement: The Case of the Russian Largest Oil and Gas Companies. Upravlenec, 9(4).DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-4-3.

Blagov, Y. E. (2010). Korporativnaya sotsialnaya otvetstvennost: evolyutsiya kontseptsiy [Corporate social responsibility: evolution of concepts]. St. Petersburg: Vyisshaya shkola menedzhmenta.

Crisóstomo, V. L., de Souza Freire, F., & De Vasconcellos, F. C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Social responsibility journal, 7(2), 295-309.

De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636-1663.

Dudukalov, E. V., Zolochevskaya, E. Y., Sorokina, M. Y., & Mangusheva, L. S. (2022). Structuring the economic space for small business in the agro-industrial complex. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 14(2), 176-215. doi:10.12731/2658-6649-2022-14-2-176-215

Efimova, O. V., Volkov, M. A., & Koroleva, D. A. (2021). Analysis of the influence of ESG principles on the return on assets: an empirical study. Finansy: teoriya i praktika= Finance: theory and practice, 25(4), 82-97.DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-4-82-97.

Gabdulkhakov, R. B., Poltarykhin, A. L., Tsukanova, O. M., & Avdeev, Y. M. (2021). Regional competitiveness assessment: prospects for the agro-industrial complex of the region. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 13(6), 339-361. doi:10.12731/2658-6649-2021-13-6-339-361

Korableva, O. N., Gorelov, N., & Kalimullina, O. (2020a). Contemporary issues of intellectual capital: Bibliographic analysis. In Engineering Assets and Public Infrastructures in the Age of Digitalization: Proceedings of the 13th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (pp. 457-464). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48021-9_51

Korableva, O. N., Mityakova, V. N., & Kalimullina, O. V. (2020b). Designing a decision support system for predicting innovation activity. Paper presented at the ICEIS 2020 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems,1, 619-625.

Liu, Y., Saleem, S., Shabbir, R., Shabbir, M. S., Irshad, A., & Khan, S. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A moderate role of fintech technology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 20174-20187.DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11822-9.

Official website of PJSC Tatneft, [Electronic resource] // https://www.tatneft.ru/en/aktsioneram-i-investoram/raskritie-informatsii/financial-and-accounting-reporting

Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of accounting and public policy, 34(4), 336-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004.

Pogosyan, V. G. (2021). Problem of innovations diffusion: A historical retrospective. Voprosy Istorii, 2021(5-2), 24-32. doi:10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202105Statyi30

Shabbir, M. S., Aslam, E., Irshad, A., Bilal, K., Aziz, S., Abbasi, B. A., & Zia, S. (2020). Nexus between corporate social responsibility and financial and non-financial sectors’ performance: a non-linear and disaggregated approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39164-39179.DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09972-x.

Vashakmadze, T. (2013). The impact of ESG factors on the future capitalization of the company. Empirical testing on the American stock market. Financial life, (4), 63-70.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

Issue

Section

Novel approaches in education, society and culture development