O papel da educação familiar na melhoria da igualdade de gênero no Vietnã
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse2.121-133Palavras-chave:
papel da família, igualdade de gênero atual, VietnãResumo
A igualdade de gênero é uma questão muito importante de preocupação para o mundo inteiro. Se a questão da libertação das mulheres é a questão mais básica entre as lutas das mulheres, então a igualdade entre homens e mulheres é considerada o conteúdo mais importante e central desta questão. A família é o lugar onde as questões de gênero são socializadas e o conhecimento e as habilidades de gênero são transmitidos. Neste artigo, o autor se concentrará em esclarecer questões como: o papel da educação; papel da propaganda para aumentar a conscientização; o papel da divisão do trabalho de acordo com o gênero; Condições para promover a igualdade de gênero da família. Por meio da pesquisa, o autor fornecerá opiniões para discussão e abrirá futuras direções de pesquisa.Referências
Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921
Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). An empirical study of employees’ motivation and its influence job satisfaction. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G. (2021). An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and its Influence Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.2.3
Allen, K. R. (2023). Feminist theory, method, and praxis: Toward a critical consciousness for family and close relationship scholars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 899-936. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211065779
Ares, M., & van Ditmars, M. M. (2023). Intergenerational social mobility, political socialization and support for the left under post-industrial realignment. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 536-554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000230
Benner, A. D., & Mistry, R. S. (2020). Child development during the COVID‐19 pandemic through a life course theory lens. Child development perspectives, 14(4), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12387
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(49), 31063-31069. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117
Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of neuroscience research, 99(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631
Cortez, R. M., & Johnston, W. J. (2020). The Coronavirus crisis in B2B settings: Crisis uniqueness and managerial implications based on social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.004
Crivello, G., & Morrow, V. (2020). Against the odds: Why some children fare well in the face of adversity. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(5), 999-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1626837
Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., Von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., ... & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological economics, 179, 106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
Dung, V. V., Minh, T. N. ., & Dinh, D. Q. . (2023). A influência da alienação do trabalho no desenvolvimento sustentável no Vietnã a partir de uma perspectiva filosófica de Karl Marx. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 16(1), 212–226. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2897
Eden, L., & Wagstaff, M. F. (2021). Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00054-w
Ehmer, J., & Lentz, C. (2023). Work and the Life Course in a Global and Multidisciplinary Perspective: An. Life Course, Work, and Labour in Global History, 18, 1.
Gazzotti, P., Emmerling, J., Marangoni, G., Castelletti, A., Wijst, K. I. V. D., Hof, A., & Tavoni, M. (2021). Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23613-y
Griffin, T., & Glover, T. D. (2023). The development of social and cultural capitals for immigrant hosts of VFR travellers. Leisure Sciences, 45(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1817201
Guhin, J., Calarco, J. M., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2021). Whatever happened to socialization? Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-103012
Koburtay, T., Syed, J., & Haloub, R. (2020). Implications of religion, culture, and legislation for gender equality at work: Qualitative insights from Jordan. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4036-6
Koster, T., Poortman, A. R., van der Lippe, T., & Kleingeld, P. (2022). Fairness perceptions of the division of household labor: Housework and childcare. Journal of Family Issues, 43(3), 679-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X219938
Kurowska, A. (2020). Gendered effects of home-based work on parents’ capability to balance work with non-work: Two countries with different models of division of labour compared. Social indicators research, 151(2), 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2034-9
Lawless, M. T., Tieu, M., Golley, R., & Kitson, A. (2024). How and where does “care” fit within seminal life‐course approaches? A narrative review and critical analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 80(3), 871-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15852
Manning, J. (2021). Decolonial feminist theory: Embracing the gendered colonial difference in management and organisation studies. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(4), 1203-1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12673
Marsh, J. (2023). Living on the Edge: An American Generation's Journey through the 20th Century by Richard A. Setterstein Jr. Glen H. Elder Jr., and Lisa D. Pierce. American Literary History, 35(1), 606-609.
Meira, J. V. D. S., & Hancer, M. (2021). Using the social exchange theory to explore the employee-organization relationship in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(2), 670-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2020-0538
Murtaz, M. (2021). Cultural capital and academic achievement: a study based on government primary school students (Doctoral dissertation, Brac University). http://hdl.handle.net/10361/15623
Ormerod, R. (2020). The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(12), 1873-1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590
Phillips, L. T., Tepper, S., Goya-Tocchetto, D., Davidai, S., Ordabayeva, N., Mirza, M. U., ... & Jachimowicz, J. (2020). Inequality in people's minds. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vawh9
Raturi, S., & Rastogi, S. (2022). Juvenile delinquency and legal aspects: Indian scenario. International Journal of Health Sciences, (I), 12297-12304. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8076
Rosenfeld, D., & Ramirez-Valles, J. (2024). Beyond identity and generations: bringing life course theory to studies of older gay men. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1393607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1393607
Samtleben, C., & Müller, K. U. (2022). Care and careers: Gender (in) equality in unpaid care, housework and employment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 77, 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100659
Schneider, N. F., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2021). Introduction: The sociology of the family–towards a European perspective. In Research handbook on the sociology of the family (pp. 2-20). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00007
Sciortino, G. (2021). A blueprint for inclusion: Talcott Parsons, the societal community and the future of universalistic solidarities. The American Sociologist, 52(1), 159-177. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09470-0
Sullivan, O. (2021). The gender division of housework and childcare. In Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family (pp. 342-354). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00033
Thomas, A., & Gupta, V. (2021). Social capital theory, social exchange theory, social cognitive theory, financial literacy, and the role of knowledge sharing as a moderator in enhancing financial well-being: from bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 664638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638
Van Dung, V. (2022). The Unity between Politics and Moral Education in the View of the Philosophers of Xian Qin Confucian. (2022). Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(4), 258. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0111
Van Dung, V. (2023). “Dialectical thought” in “The Five Elements Theory” in ancient China. Argumentos n. 29 (2023). http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/81373
Van Raalte, A. A., Klüsener, S., Oksuzyan, A., & Grigoriev, P. (2020). Declining regional disparities in mortality in the context of persisting large inequalities in economic conditions: the case of Germany. International journal of epidemiology, 49(2), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz265
Vo Van Dung, & Luu Mai Hoa. (2023). Theoretical perspectives of the view of human in the Confucian philosophy in pre qin dynasty. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 15(2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2021.4022
Waddell, N., Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., & Hammond, M. D. (2021). Gendered division of labor during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for relationship problems and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1759-1781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996476
Walker, J., Selous, A., & Misca, G. (2020). Living in our shoes: Understanding the needs of UK armed forces families. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/living-.
Wasilah, S. (2023). Education in a Functional Structural Perspective and Conflict Regarding Social Relations in Society. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 8(3), 902-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5922
Whelan, M., McGillivray, J., & Rinehart, N. J. (2023). Using life course theory to explore the association between autistic traits, child, family, and school factors and the successful transition to secondary school. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05845-z
Yang, Q., Li, S., Cui, H., & Qiao, J. (2023). How does supplier relationship management affect supplier innovation contribution? Interorganizational learning and social exchange theory integrated perspectives. Industrial Marketing Management, 114, 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.08.003
Zerbe Enns, C., Díaz, L. C., & Bryant-Davis, T. (2021). Transnational feminist theory and practice: An introduction. Women & Therapy, 44(1-2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1774997
Zhao, L., & Detlor, B. (2023). Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1866444
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Duong Thi Tuoi
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. A revista segue a política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre, oferecendo acesso livre, imediato e gratuito ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona mais democratização internacional do conhecimento. Por isso, não se aplica taxas, sejam elas para submissão, avaliação, publicação, visualização ou downloads dos artigos. Além disso, a revista segue a licença Creative Common (CC BY) permitindo qualquer divulgação do artigo, desde que sejam referenciados o artigo original. Neste sentido, os autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos: A) Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista. B) Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional e não institucional, bem como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. C) Autores sãoo estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: repositórios online ou na sua página pessoal), bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
