The Problematics of Value Orientations in the Discourse of Contemporary Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v18.nse1.224-233Abstract
The relevance of the chosen topic is based on the importance of understanding how values influence individual and societal behavior, particularly in times of crisis. The shift in values in response to social crises and global transformations demands detailed analysis to understand how they adapt to new conditions and which factors have the most significant influence on this process. In this study the problem of value orientations in Ukrainian society under martial law was analyzed. The following methods were used: the method of abstraction and generalization; the method of analysis and synthesis; a systems approach; axiological approach; sociocultural analysis. Research on value orientations in Ukrainian society shows that their transformation is directly linked to social, political, and military events that have affected societal priorities and individual beliefs. Following the outbreak of the full-scale war, the values prioritized by Ukrainians have become security, protection, freedom, independence, solidarity, and patriotism. These values have come to the forefront as society faces an existential threat, prompting a reevaluation of previous orientations. In this context, national identity has gained particular importance, with Ukrainians perceiving it not only as cultural and historical heritage but also as the foundation for their fight for the right to exist. Another significant aspect is the shift away from material values. In times of war, moral categories such as honor, responsibility, humanity, helping others, volunteerism, and collective actions take precedence. The relationship between society and government has also changed, with heightened demands for transparency, honesty, and accountability from political leaders. Values provide direction for actions and serve as benchmarks for comparing reality with desired outcomes (during crises, such as war, they become guiding principles, influencing priorities and decision-making). In times of war or social instability, values related to security, stability, and protection take precedence, altering people’s priorities and behavioral strategies. Media, politics, and other social factors can significantly influence the formation and transformation of values, which is especially evident during an information war. Finally, during periods of profound social change, the breakdown of old value systems can lead to anomie (social disorganization) and polarization within society.
References
Bekeshkina, I. E. (2019). Ukrainian civil society: Self-assessment and diagnosis. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 3, 18–21.
Berehova, O., Dutchak, V., Karas, H., Kukuruza, N., Fedorak, V. (2024). Intercultural communication in crisis: addressing the new wave of Ukrainian emigration. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 17(4). https://www.brajets.com/index.php/brajets/article/view/1912
Bourdieu, P. (2023). Politics and sociology: General sociology. Boston: Polity.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1978). Revolution and transformation of societies. New York: Free Press.
Holovakha, E. I. (2002). The phenomenon of the “amoral majority” in post-Soviet society: Transformation of mass perceptions of social behavior norms in Ukraine. Monitoring of Social Changes. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine, 460–468.
Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Jowitt, K. (1971). Revolutionary breakthroughs and national development: The case of Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kavalerov, A. A. (2001). Value in sociocultural transformation. Odesa: Astroprint.
Kostenko, N. V. (1993). Values and symbols in mass communication. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2009). Cosmopolitan communications: Cultural diversity in a globalized world. New York: Cambridge University Press. Abstract.
Panina, N. V. (2007). Life, scientific activity, path to the future. https://isnasu.org.ua/assets/files/books/2007/book-2007.pdf
Pipes, R. (1999). Property and freedom. New York: Knopf.
Poltorak, V. A. (2000). Sociology of public opinion. Kyiv-Dnipropetrovsk: Center “Sociopolis”.
Ruchka, A. O. (2011). Value priorities of the population of Ukraine in the context of transformation. Ukrainian Society: Sociological Monitoring, 201–215. Kyiv: IS NAS of Ukraine.
Rudnev, M. A. (2008). Richard Pipes as a historian of Russian conservatism. In Historiographical and source studies of the history of Ukraine: Explorations in theory and methodology of research. Dnipropetrovsk.
Shulha, M. (2014). Aberrant state of social consciousness of Ukrainian society. Ukrainian society. Monitoring of Social Changes: Collection of Scientific Works, 1(15), 512-545.
Soltani, H., & Salami, A. (2023). Gender differences and liberation of female subjects discourse: The case study of American novel. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n3.706-717
Vyshniak, O. I. (2000). Dynamics of ideological orientations and electoral behavior of the population of Ukraine (1994-2000). In Ukrainian Society Monitoring - 2000. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine, 129–135.
Zlobina, O. G., & Shulha, M. O. (2017). Contradictions of civilizational orientations in society. In The state of contemporary Ukrainian society: Civilizational dimension (pp. 32–51). Kyiv: IS NAS of Ukraine.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oksana Stadnik, Olena Vaniushyna, Olena Khodus , Victoriia Boiko, Taisiia Gaivoronska, Natalia Dievochkina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.