Who are the digital natives? Bibliometric analysis of the research on digital natives in international scope (2013-2022)

Authors

  • Breno Prado da Silva Faculdade Antonio Meneghetti https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-9515
  • Ricardo Schaefer Faculdade Antonio Meneghetti, AMF; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, UFU
  • Patrícia Wazlawick Faculdade Antonio Meneghetti, AMF; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, UFSC https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4902-0526

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v18.n3.764-785

Keywords:

Digital natives, Net generation, Generation Y, Millennials, Youth

Abstract

Aiming to contribute to the knowledge on digital natives today, from international publications from the last decade, a bibliometric study was carried out on a total sample of 377 articles. These were collected from the Scopus indexing database, in the period 2013-2022, containing the root term “digital nativ*”, without region/country restriction, so to obtain the international panorama on the topic. The bibliometric analysis of the sample was carried out using the Biblioshiny interface of the Bibliometrix tool in the RStudio software. Additionally, a summary table was created containing the empirical contributions of the ten most cited articles in the sample. The results of the bibliometric analysis were: (1) the main themes related to digital natives researched in the period are “social networks”, “digital divide”, “information and communication technologies” and “education”; (2) most articles published about digital natives come from a few countries, most of which are high-income; (3) of the ten most cited articles, all of them researched in the educational field; (4) international research on digital natives showed an increasing trend in the period analyzed. The results obtained from the preparation of the summary table were: (1) there are universal characteristics in young people of this generation; (2) there are widespread features that have been proven not consistent; (3) there are new characteristics observed, compared to research from previous decades; (4) there are concepts, characteristics and analysis factors of key importance in the study and understanding of digital natives.

Author Biographies

  • Breno Prado da Silva, Faculdade Antonio Meneghetti

    Restinga Sêca, RS, Brasil

  • Ricardo Schaefer, Faculdade Antonio Meneghetti, AMF; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, UFU

    Restinga Sêca, RS, Brasil

  • Patrícia Wazlawick, Faculdade Antonio Meneghetti, AMF; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, UFSC

    Restinga Sêca, RS, Brasil

References

AKÇAYIR, M.; DÜNDAR, H.; AKÇAYIR, G. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 435-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089

BAUDIER, P.; AMMI, C.; DEBOEUF-ROUCHON, M. (2020). Smart home: Highly-educated students' acceptance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.043

BELLINI, C. G. P.; ISONI FILHO, M. M.; DE MOURA JUNIOR, P. J.; DE FARIA PEREIRA, R. d. C. (2016). Self-efficacy and anxiety of digital natives in face of compulsory computer-mediated tasks: a study about digital capabilities and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 49-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.015

BENNETT, S.; MATON, K.; KERVIN, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x

BROWN, C.; CZERNIEWICZ, L. (2010). Debunking the ""digital native"": beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x

CALVANI, A.; CARTELLY A.; FINI, A.; RANIERI, M. (2009). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society (English Version), 4(3), 183-193.

CAMERON, D. (2005). The net generation goes to the university? Journalism Education Association Conference, Queensland, Australia.

COMPEAU, D.; HIGGINS, C. (2016). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2):189-211. CORREA, T. Digital skills and social media use: how Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information Communication and Society, 19(8), 1095-1107. DOI: https://doi-org.ez47.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023

FERRO, E.; HELBIG, N. C.; GIL-GARCIA, J. R. (2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. In: Proc 5th int conf on electronic government, 28(1), 3-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.007

GILSTER, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.

GHU, X.; ZHU, Y.; GUO, X. (2013). Meeting the Digital Natives: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 392-402.

GUO, RX.; DOBSON, T.; PETRINA, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: an analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.a

HARGITTAI, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

JONES, C.; RAMANU, R.; CROSS, S.; HEALING, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722-732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022

KLEIM, J. A.; JONES, T. A. (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(1), S225-S239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018)

KTORIDOU, D.; ETEOKLEOUS-GRIGORIOU, N. (2011). Developing digital immigrants' computer literacy: the case of unemployed women. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(3), 154-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741111145689

LI, Y.; RANIERI, M. (2010). Are ""digital natives"" really digitally competent? A study on Chinese teenagers. British Journal of Educational Technolgy, 41, 1029-1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01053.x

MÄNTYMÄKI, M.; SALO, J. (2015). Why do teens spend real money in virtual worlds? A consumption values and developmental psychology perspective on virtual consumption. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 124-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.004

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. National Academy Press, Washington.

O’BANNON, B. W.; THOMAS, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers and Education, 74, 15-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006

OBLINGER, D. G.; HAGNER, P. (2015) Seminar on educating the net generation.

OBLINGER, D.; OBLINGER, J.; (2005). Educating the net generation. Educause, Washington.

PALFREY, J.; GASSER, U. (2013). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books.

PARKES, M.; STEIN, S.; READING, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002

PERILLO, S. (2007). Reaching generation Y to be or not to be - relevant. Australian Anglican Schools Network, Melbourne, 17-19.

PRENSKY, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), MCB UP Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

PRENSKY, M. (2001b). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.

PRENSKY, M. (2001c). Immigrants part 2: do they. On the Horizon, 9(06), 2-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843

RAINIE, L. (2006). Digital 'natives' invade the workplace. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

ROSEN, L. D. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. Macmillan.

SANCHEZ, R. A.; CORTIJO, V.; JAVED, U. (2014). Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012

SMALL, G.; VORGAN, G. (2008). iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. Harper.

SOMYÜREK, S.; COSKUN, B. K. (2013). Digital competence: Is it an innate talent of the new generation or an ability that must be developed? British Journal of Education Technology, 44(5), E163-E166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12044

STRAUSS, W.; HOWE, N. (1992). Generations: the history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. Morrow.

TAPSCOTT, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.

TEO, T.; KABAÇI YURDAKUL, I.; URSAVAS, Ö. F. (2014). Exploring the digital natives among pre-service teachers in Turkey: a cross-cultural validation of the Digital Native Assessment Scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1231-1244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.980275

THANUSKODI, S. (2010). Journal of Social Sciences: A Bibliometric Study. Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 77-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2010.11892847

THE WORLD BANK GROUP. (2022). New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2022-2023. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2022-2023.

THINYANE, H. (2010). Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? as investigation into South African first year students' use and experience with technology. Computers & Education, 55(1), 406-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.005

THOMPSON, P. (2015). How digital native learners describe themselves. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 467-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9295-3

THOMPSON, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022

UNESCO. (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers: implementation guidelines, version 1.0. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000156209.

UNESCO. (2009). Padrões de competência em TIC para professores: diretrizes de implementação, versão 1.0. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000156209_por.

WANG, Q.; MYERS, M. D.; SUNDARAM, D. (2013). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Towards a model of digital fluency. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 409-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y

WANG, E.; MYERS, M. D.; SUNDARAM, D. (2012). DIGITAL NATIVES AND DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS: TOWARDS A MODEL OF DIGITAL FLUENCY. ECIS 2012 Proceedings. 39. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2012/39.

WANG, S.-K.; HSU, H.-Y.; CAMPBELL, T.; COSTER, D. C.; LONGHURST, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 637-662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4

Published

28-09-2025

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Prado da Silva, B., Schaefer, R., & Wazlawick, P. (2025). Who are the digital natives? Bibliometric analysis of the research on digital natives in international scope (2013-2022). Cadernos De Educação Tecnologia E Sociedade, 18(3), 764-785. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v18.n3.764-785