Determinants Influencing the Mastery of Preclinical Medical Skills: A Study From the Mekong Delta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v18.nse3.139-148Palavras-chave:
Medical Education, Clinical Medical Skills, Curriculum Evaluation, Medical Students, Program EffectivenessResumo
This study was conducted at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, a leading health sciences institution in the Mekong Delta region, to evaluate the adequacy of the medical skills training program for fifth- and sixth-year medical students. This study utilizes a quantitative methodology, gathering data from survey questionnaires completed by fifth- and sixth-year medical students at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. The research aims to evaluate students' proficiency in medical skills practice and to investigate how variables such as academic year, academic performance, and post-graduation career preferences influence students' perceptions of the medical skills training program. A quantitative study involving 462 fifth- and sixth-year medical students demonstrated a high level of responsiveness to the medical skills training program (p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant correlation was observed between students' perceptions of the program and their competency in medical skills practice. This study reveals that a positive perception of the medical skills training program does not directly translate into superior practical competency. Academic performance emerged as a key determinant, with students in the 'Good-Excellent' category demonstrating a significantly higher responsiveness rate (90.3%) than their 'Average-Poor' counterparts (77.9%) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, students' intended post-graduation workplace influenced their perception, with those planning to work at the provincial level reporting a more favorable evaluation than those targeting district-level positions. However, no significant differences in practical competency were observed between these groups. These findings highlight the critical need for curriculum enhancements, improved infrastructure, and increased engagement of clinical faculty to ensure the effectiveness of medical skills training programs.Referências
Ahmed Mujamammi, Sultan A Alqahtani, & Feras Alqaidi. (2024). Evaluation of Medical Students’ Satisfaction With Using a Simulation-Based Learning Program as a Method for Clinical Teaching. Cureus, 16(4), e59364. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59364
Alanazi AA, Nicholson N, & Thomas S. (2017). Use of simulation training to improve knowledge, skills, and confidence among healthcare students: A systematic review. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 15(3), 1-24. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2017.1666
Amitai Ziv, Paul Root Wolpe, Stephen D Small, & Glick, S. (2003). Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 783-788. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006
Andy Field. (2024). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistic, 6th. Sage Publications Limited, 1145 pages.
B. De Wever, T. Schellens, M. Valcke, & H. Van Keer. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo. (2010). Quyết định 4138/QĐ-BGDĐT ngày 20/9/2010 phê duyệt Đề án Xây dựng và phát triển hệ thống kiểm định chất lượng giáo dục đối với giáo dục đại học và trung cấp chuyên nghiệp giai đoạn 2011-2020.
Clode N. J., Danielson K., & & Dennett E. (2021). Perceptions of competency with evidence-based medicine among medical students: Changes through training and alignment with objective measures. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 134(1531), 63-75.
Dang Thanh Hong. (2023). Factors Affecting Results of Pre-clinical Phase1 of Medical Students: A Research in Mekong Delta. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 3(9), 1883-1888. doi:10.55677/ijssers/V03I9Y2023-15
Dunham L., Dekhtyar M., Gruener G., CichoskiKelly E., Deitz J., Elliott D., & & Stuber M. L. (2017). Medical student perceptions of the learning environment in medical school change as students transition to clinical training in undergraduate medical school. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 29(4), 383-391.
Ericsson K Anders. (2004). Deliberate Practice and the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expert Performance in Medicine and Related Domains. Academic Medicine, 79(10 Suppl), S70-S81. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
H. Barrows, & R. Tamblyn. (1980). Problem-based learning : an approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.
Harden R. M. (2002). Developments in outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 117-120. doi: 10.1080/01421590220120669
Heba Al‑Omary, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Derek Stewart, & and Zachariah Nazar. (2024). Implementing learning into practice from continuous professional development activities: a scoping review of health professionals’ views and experiences. Medical Education, 24(1031), 1-13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06016-7
Isa Ado Abubakar. (2013). Career Guidance, Participation of Students and Its Implication for Kano, Nigeria. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 1(3), 14-19.
John Spencer. (2003). Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ, 326(7389), 591-594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.591
Likert, R., 22 140, 55. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5-55.
Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison. (2018). Research Methods in Educatio. Routledge, 944 pages.
Lucy Abell, Francesca Maher, & Angus C Jennings and Laura J Gray. (2023). A systematic review of simulation studies which compare existing statistical methods to account for non-compliance in randomised controlled trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23(300), 1-19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02126-w
Nasrin Mohammadiaghdam, Leila Doshmangir, Javad Babaie, Roghayeh Khabiri, & Koen Ponnet. (2020). Determining factors in the retention of physicians in rural and underdeveloped areas: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract, 21(216), 1-23. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01279-7
Nouf Sulaiman Alharbi. (2024). Evaluating competency-based medical education: a systematized review of current practices. BMC Medical Education, 24(612), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05609-6
P Bradley, & K Postlethwaite. (2003). Setting up a clinical skills learning facility. Medical educaton, 37(Suppl. 1), 6–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.37.s1.11.x
S Barry Issenberg, William C McGaghie, Emil R Petrusa, David Lee Gordon, & Ross J Scalese. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10-28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924
Sonu Goel, Federica Angeli, Nonita Dhirar, Garima Sangwan, Kanchan Thakur, & Dirk Ruwaard. (2019). Factors affecting medical students’ interests in working in rural areas in North India—A qualitative inquiry. PLoS One, 14(1), e0210251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210251
Van De Tran, Duy Toan Pham, Tran Nhat Phong Dao, & Kieu Anh Tho Pham. (2022). Willingness of Healthcare Students in Vietnam to Volunteer During the COVID‑19 Pandemic. Journal of Community Health, 47, 108–117. doi:10.1007/s10900-021-01030-y
Yu-Ru Lin, Ching-Hsing Lee, Yu-Che Chang, & Shou-Yen Chen. (2021). Top-cited articles on simulation in the medical education field. Signa Vitae, 18(3), 146-152. doi: 10.22514/sv.2021.244
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Dang Thanh Hong, Nguyen Minh Phuong, Le Duc Ngoc
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.