Implementing interdisciplinary methods in the educational framework

Authors

  • Olena Sukhomlynova Kruty Heroes Military Institute of Telecommunications and Information Technology
  • Tetiana Lysenko Bogomolets National Medical University
  • Olha Rembach Leonid Uzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law
  • Viktoriia Pavelko Kremenets Taras Shevchenko Regional Academy of Humanities and Pedagogy
  • Yurii Kovalchuk Uman National University of Horticulture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse3.61-72

Keywords:

discipline integration, higher education institution, scientific inquiry, educational process, binary lecture

Abstract

The article aims to study the principles and ways of implementing the interdisciplinary approach into the educational process. The research is based on empirical experience in teaching at higher education institutions, an analysis of educational programmes of higher educational institutions in Ukraine, a survey of medical university lecturers, as well as a pedagogical experiment on the effectiveness of the interdisciplinary approach conducted at Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University among second-year students of the Dentistry programme. The control group studied two separate subjects, “Foreign (English) Language for Professional Purposes” and “Social Medicine, Public Health, and the Fundamentals of Evidence-Based Medicine”, while the experimental group took an integrated course, Module 1, which combined these two subjects in the form of binary lessons. The integrated course had the most significant impact on forming sufficient and high levels of knowledge, with a difference of 9% and 7%, respectively, between the control and experimental groups. Additionally, the experimental group had 10% fewer students with low-developed skills and abilities. The experiment data confirm the considerable effectiveness of integrated courses, suggesting that universities should actively introduce them into the educational process. The authors propose the following ways to implement the interdisciplinary approach: inclusion of interdisciplinary topics in lectures; conducting binary lectures; integrating common cases into seminar and practical disciplines to solve interdisciplinary practical tasks and other modern educational technologies of problem-based learning; developing interdisciplinary courses for elective and optional subjects; preparing articles and conference presentations with two or more co-authors from related fields of knowledge. Based on the empirical method, it was established that the effectiveness of applying the interdisciplinary approach in higher education is associated with the systematisation and structuring of acquired specialised knowledge, stimulation of student motivation, and scientific inquiry.

References

Barry, A., & Born, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. In Interdisciplinarity. (pp. 1-56). Routledge. ISBN 9780203584279.

Barry, A., Born, G., & Weszkalnys, G. (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and society, 37(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760841

Birsel, Z., Marques, L., & Loots, E. (2023). Daring to disentangle: towards a framework for art-science-technology collaborations. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2134539

Corbacho, A. M., Minini, L., Pereyra, M., González-Fernández, A. E., Echániz, R., Repetto, L., ... & Basile, M. (2021). Interdisciplinary higher education with a focus on academic motivation and teamwork diversity. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062

Honchar, L., Derkachova, O., Shakhrai, V., Saienko, V., Hladoshchuk, O., & Voropayeva, T. (2021). Formation of psychological readiness of the teacher to implement information and communication technologies in professional activities. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 15(38), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2021.15.38

Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analysing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research policy, 39(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011

Kessel, F., Rosenfield, P., & Anderson, N. (2008). Interdisciplinary Research: Case Studies from Health and Social Science. New York; online edn, Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195324273.001.0001

Kryvoshein, V., Vdovenko, N., Buriak, I., Saienko, V., & Kolesnyk, A. (2022). Innovative educational technologies in management training: experience of EU countries. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(6), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.6.8

Lam, J. C., Walker, R. M., & Hills, P. (2014). Interdisciplinarity in sustainability studies: a review. Sustainable Development, 22(3), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.533

Mäkinen, E. (2018). Complexity leadership theory and the leaders of transdisciplinary science. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 21, 133–155. https://doi.org/10.28945/4009

Mäkinen, E. I., Evans, E. D., & McFarland, D. A. (2020). The patterning of collaborative behavior and knowledge culminations in interdisciplinary research centers. Minerva, 58, 71–95. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-019-09381-6

Mansilla, B. (2006a). Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration. Research evaluation, 15(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776075

Mansilla, В. (2006b). Interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical examination of expert interdisciplinary epistemologies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 31(24), 1–31.

Mansilla, B., & Learning, V. (2017). A cognitive-epistemological foundation. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, 261. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=d1XjDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA261&ots=9ONJoVJpfp&sig=U4wwHxvGfhNQbcYiivh_fFw86PQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Mansilla, В., Lamont, M., & Sato, K. (2016). Shared cognitive–emotional–interactional platforms: markers and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 571–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915614103

Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of Transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009

Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of Transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 70(3-4), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631

Patel, М., & Dr. Dipti P. Bhatt. (2024). Study of interdisciplinary approaches in school education. A Global Journal of Humanities, VII. https://www.gapbodhitaru.org/res/articles/(63-65)%20STUDY%20OF%20INTERDISCIPLINARY%20APPROACHES%20IN%20SCHOOL%20EDUCATION.pdf

Pohl, C., Klein, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C., & Fam, D. (2021). Conceptualising Transdisciplinary Integration as a Multidimensional Interactive Process. Environmental Science and Policy, 118, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005

Ratna, H. (2019). The importance of effective communication in healthcare practice. Harvard Public Health Review, 23. https://doi.org/10.54111/0001/W4

Riera, R., de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca, C., Padovez, R. C. M. et al. (2023). Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and the population: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 21, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01017-2

Sameshima, P., Maarhuis, P. L., & Wiebe, S. (2019). Parallaxic praxis: Multimodal interdisciplinary pedagogical research design. Vernon Press. https://vernonpress.com/index.php/file/8770/838db6f55eafbffff386e4dacf1ba48c/1555508069.pdf

Sanchez-Carrillo, J. C., Cadarso, M. A., & Tobarra, M. A. (2021). Embracing higher education leadership in sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126675

Stein, Z., Connell, M., & Gardner, H. (2008). Exercising quality control in interdisciplinary education: Toward an epistemologically responsible approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3-4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00655.x

Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., & Taylor, B. K. (2008). The Ecology of Team Science. Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S96–S115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003

Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., & Harvey, R. (2023). Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5(Suppl_1), December, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001625555

Sukhomlynova, O., Heseleva, K., & Dumanska, T. (2024). Integration of mathematical disciplines into the interdisciplinary context of higher education preparation: relevance, benefits, challenges. Science and Technology Today, 5(33), 920–933. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2024-5(33)-920-933

Tsybuliak, N., Suchikova, Y., Hurenko, O., Lopatina, H., Kovachov, S., & Bohdanov, I. (2023). Ukrainian universities at the time of war: From occupation to temporary relocation. Torture, 33(3), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v33i3.136256

Voropayeva, T., Järvis, M., Boiko, S., Tolchieva, H., & Statsenko, N. (2022). European experience in implementing innovative educational technologies in the training of management specialists: current problems and prospects for improvement. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(7), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.7.35

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05

Issue

Section

Innovative technologies and their impact on the education