Criando um Ambiente de Aprendizagem Confortável: O Papel dos Professores e Buscadores de Educação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n1.153-162Palavras-chave:
Aprendizagem confortável, psicanálise, pedagogia psicanalítica, educação, condições pedagógicas, ambiente de aprendizagemResumo
As principais tarefas do sistema educacional são garantir o cumprimento dos direitos humanos e liberdades dos alunos. Eles incluem o direito à educação, processo educacional seguro para a vida e a saúde e preservação e melhoria da saúde da geração mais jovem. Alunos e professores exigem um ambiente educacional onde se sintam fisicamente, psicologicamente, informacionalmente e socialmente seguros, confortáveis e bem-estar. Os participantes do processo educacional estão interessados em organizar um processo educacional o mais confortável possível, que possa fornecer condições adequadas e seguras para o aprendizado, a educação e o desenvolvimento das crianças. Todas as partes interessadas na educação devem contribuir ativamente para a educação dos alunos e desenvolver suas habilidades para criar um estilo de vida saudável e seguro para atingir esses objetivos. O artigo visa destacar as principais perspectivas apresentadas em pesquisas modernas por estudiosos de todo o mundo sobre as especificidades do papel do professor e do aluno na criação de um ambiente de aprendizagem confortável. O trabalho pretende revelar as características da influência dos alunos sobre a conveniência e eficiência do processo educacional. Durante a pesquisa, os autores aplicaram os seguintes métodos de processamento de dados: análise, síntese da informação, abstração, analogia e formalização dos resultados teóricos e práticos sobre o tema em questão. O estudo é baseado nos trabalhos de estudiosos de todo o mundo sobre a organização do ambiente de aprendizagem em vários níveis do processo educacional. Os resultados da pesquisa identificaram os aspectos teóricos fundamentais da criação de um ambiente de aprendizagem confortável do ponto de vista das condições psicológicas e sociais na organização do processo educacional. Durante o processo de pesquisa, os autores analisaram as especificidades das contribuições de professores e alunos para a criação de um ambiente de aprendizagem seguro.Referências
Alghasab, M., Hardman, J., & Handley, Z. (2019). Teacher-student interaction on wikis: fostering collaborative learning and writing. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 10–20. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210656118302253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.12.002.
Aryani, F., Umar, N. F., & Kasim, S. N. O. (2020). Psychological well-being of students in undergoing online learning during pandemi COVID-19. In International Conference on Science and Advanced Technology, 1747–1756. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/icsat/article/view/19985.
Beerkens, M. (2018). Evidence-based Policy and Higher Education Quality Assurance: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise. European Journal of Higher Education, 8, 3, 272–287. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21568235.2018.1475248. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1475248
Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J. & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning–a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1, 1–17. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0.
Cano, M., Murray, R. & Kourouklis, A. (2022). Can Lean Management Change the Managerial Culture in Higher Education? Studies in Higher Education, 47, 4, 915–927. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2020.1817892?journalCode=cshe20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1817892
Cheung, S.K., Phusavat, K. & Yang, H.H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1, 1-9. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1
Cipriano, C., Barnes, T. N., Kolev, L., Rivers, S. & Brackett, M. (2019). Validating the emotion-focused interactions scale for teacher–student interactions. Learning Environments Research, 22, 1, 1–12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10984-018-9264-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9264-2
Cui, V., French, A. & O’Leary, M. (2021). A Missed Opportunity? How the UK’s Teaching Excellence Framework Fails to Capture the Voice of University Staff. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 9, 1756–1770. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2019.1704721?journalCode=cshe20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019. 1704721
Dodd, A. L., Priestley, M., Tyrrell, K., Cygan, S., Newell, C. & Byrom, N. C. (2021). University student well-being in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of its conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 30, 3, 375–387. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875419?journalCode=ijmh20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875419.
Falcon, S., Admiraal, W. & Leon, J. (2023). Teachers' engaging messages and the relationship with students' performance and teachers' enthusiasm. Learning and Instruction, 86, 2023, 101750. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475223000191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101750
Farhah, I., Saleh, A. Y. & Safitri, S. (2021). The role of student-teacher relationship to teacher subjective well-being as moderated by teaching experience. Journal of Education and Learning, 15, 2, 267–274. http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/article/view/18330. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.18330
Germain-Alamartine, E., Ahoba-Sam, R., Moghadam-Saman, S. & Evers, G. (2021). Doctoral Graduates' Transition to Industry: Networks as a Mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 12, 2680–2695. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783
Granić, A. & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: a systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 5, 2572–2593. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12864. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Hamdan, K. & Amorri, A. (2022). The Impact of Online Learning Strategies on Students' Academic Performance. E-Learning and Digital Education in the Twenty-First Century. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/74314. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94425
Hazen, B.T., Skipper, J.B., Boone, C.A. & Hill, R.R. (2018). Back in Business: Operations Research in Support of Big Data Analytics for Operations and Supply Chain Management. Annals of Operations Research, 270, 1, 201–211. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-016-2226-0. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10479-016-2226-0
Hou, A.Y.C., Hill, C., Hu, Z. & Lin, L. (2022). What is Driving Taiwan Government for Policy Change in Higher Education After the Year of 2016 – in Search of Egalitarianism or Pursuit of Academic Excellence? Studies in Higher Education, 47, 2, 338–351. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2020.1744126?journalCode=cshe20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1744126
Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M. & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28, 4–5, 462–512. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730?journalCode=hlns20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
Ibaraki, A. (2022). Promoting student well-being through classroom interventions. Teaching of Psychology, 3, 1–12. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00986283211063582. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211063582.
Kalashnikova, S., Drach, I., Palamarchuk, O., Ryabchenko, V., Chervona L. (2019). Analiz providnoho vitchyznyanoho ta zarubizhnoho dosvidu shhodo mexanizmiv realizaciyi efektyvnoho vryaduvannya v universytetax [Analysis of leading domestic and foreign experience regarding the mechanisms of implementing effective governance in universities]. (chastyna II). Kyiv: Instytut vyshhoyi osvity NAPN Ukrayiny, 96. https://ihed.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Analiz_dosvidu_vriaduvania_v_univer_ch2_analit_IVO-2019-96p_avtors-kolektiv.pdf. https://doi.org/10.31874/978-617-7486-30-4-2019 [in Ukrainian]
Lokshyna, O.I., Hlushko, O.Z., Dzhurylo, A.P., Kravchenko, C.M., Nikolska, N.V., Tymenko, M.M., Shparyk O.M. (2021). Tendenciyi rozvytku shkilnoyi osvity v krayinax YeS, SShA ta Kytayi: monohrafiya [Trends in the development of school education in the countries of the EU, the USA, and China: a monograph]. Kyiv: KONVI PRINT. 350. https://undip.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/21-13.pdf. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-617-8124-17-5-2021-350 [in Ukrainian]
Moscardini, A.O., Strachan, R. & Vlasova, T. (2022). The role of universities in modern society. Studies in Higher Education, 47, 4, 812–830. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2020.1807493?journalCode=cshe20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1807493
Nacionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennya yakosti vyshhoyi osvity [National Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education] (2022). Richnyj zvit Nacionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennya yakosti vyshhoyi osvity za 2021 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education for 2021], 232 ttps://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/%D0%97%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82-2021.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Nguyen, T. et al. (2022). How teachers manage their classroom in the digital learning environment – experiences from the University Smart Learning Project. Heliyon, 8, 10, e10817. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022021053.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10817
Parry, S. & Metzger, E. (2023). Barriers to learning for sustainability: a teacher perspective. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 6. https://sustainableearthreviews.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42055-022-00050-3
Poots, A. & Cassidy, T. (2020). Academic expectation, self-compassion, psychological capital, social support, and student well-being. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101506. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883035519312947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101506
Senoner, J., Netland, T. & Feuerriegel, S. (2022). Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Improve Process Quality: Evidence from Semiconductor Manufacturing. Management Science, 68, 8, 5704–5723. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4190. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4190
Smith, A. & Firman, K. (2020). The microstructure of the student well-being process questionnaire. Journal of Education, Society, and Behavioral Science, 33, 1, 76–83. https://journaljesbs.com/index.php/JESBS/article/view/928. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i130196
Stoian, C.E., Fărcașiu, M.A., Dragomir, G.-M. & Gherheș, V. (2023). Transition from Online to Face-to-Face Education after COVID-19: The Benefits of Online Education from Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 14, 19, 12812; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912812. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12812
Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä M., Kokko, A.K. (2021). Learning environments preferred by university students: a shift toward informal and flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 24, 6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346096838_Learning_environments_preferred_by_university_students_a_shift_toward_informal_and_flexible_learning_environments. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09339-6.
Xiao, M., Tian Z. & Xu, W. (2023). Impact of teacher-student interaction on students’ classroom well-being under online education environment. Education and Information Technologies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-023-11681-0
Yanqing, D., Guangming, C. & Edwards, J.S. (2020). Understanding the Impact of Business Analytics on Innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 281, 3, 673–686. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221718305447. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.021
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Olena Antoniuk, Anton Vertel, Alla Kolodyazhna, Rymma Kyrychenko, Ruslana Mnozhynska
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. A revista segue a política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre, oferecendo acesso livre, imediato e gratuito ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona mais democratização internacional do conhecimento. Por isso, não se aplica taxas, sejam elas para submissão, avaliação, publicação, visualização ou downloads dos artigos. Além disso, a revista segue a licença Creative Common (CC BY) permitindo qualquer divulgação do artigo, desde que sejam referenciados o artigo original. Neste sentido, os autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos: A) Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista. B) Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional e não institucional, bem como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. C) Autores sãoo estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: repositórios online ou na sua página pessoal), bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
