A INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA ALÉM DO MUNDO ACADÉMICO
A UTILIDADE DAS COMPETÊNCIAS NAS METODOLOGIAS, MÉTODOS E TÉCNICAS QUALITATIVAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.nse1.91-100Palavras-chave:
qualitative research; academic formation, no academic world; academia; micro projects; desafiosResumo
A formação lecionada pelas universidades têm por destino formar profissionais que respondam às necessidades da sociedade que integram. Um dos problemas antigos das universidades está em centrarem-se mais para as suas necessidades fechando-se sobre si próprias. Há um distanciamento entre o mundo académico e mundo do trabalho. Quando se termina uma licenciatura, mestrado ou doutoramento, o aluno questiona a utilidade de conteúdos e competências adquiridas na universidade. Esta problemática levou a centrar a atenção e objetivo em mostrar a utilidade de ter conhecimentos e competências nas metodologia, métodos e técnicas qualitativas no mundo do trabalho. Em termos metodológicos este artigo é uma autoetnografia colaborativa composta por dois investigadores: uma professora de Educação Especial que narra o seu trabalho ao longo da carreira; e um outro investigador que no discurso da docente que procura referências a técnicas, métodos e metodologias qualitativas. É uma pesquisa descritiva, narrativa e reflexiva que parte do percurso de vida de uma docente de Educação Especial. As conclusões que se retiraram desta pequena investigação, é que uma investigação social a nível profissional é diferente da académica. Pode ser mais flexível, mais pequena, visa um fim específico. Tudo depende da profissão e organização onde o investigador se insere.Referências
Abbot, A. (1992). What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In Ragin, C. C. & Becker H. D. What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambrige. Cambridge University Press.
Adams, T. E., Jones, S. H. & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography: understanding qualitative research. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Alboreto, L., et al. (1997). Práticas e métodos de investigação em Ciências Sociais. Lisboa. Gradiva.
Aidley, D. & Fearon F. (2021). Doing accessible social research. Bristol. Bristol University Press.
Almeida, J. F. & Pinto, J. M. (1990). A investigação nas ciências sociais (4ª Ed.). Lisboa. Editorial Presença.
Anderson, R, K (2011). Intuitive inquiry: Developing the mirroring discourse of disease. In Wertz, F. J., et al. E. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis. New York. The Guilford Press.
Beley, L. E. & Fenow, M. M. (2016). Foundational commitments, intergenerational knowledge production, and new trajectories: feminist methodologies. In Cannella, G. S., Pérez, M. S. & Pasque, P. A. (Eds.). Critical qualitative inquiry: foundations and futures. New York. Routledge.
Bishop, R. (2016). Freeing ourselves: an indigenous response to neo-colonial dominance in research, classrooms, schools, and education systems. In Denzin, N. K. & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). Qualitative inquiry outside the academy. New York. Routlege.
Camalhão, S & Camalhão I.. (2022). The methodological thesis: Methodology seen as theory and theory as methodology. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 14, e592. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e592.
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W. & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoetnography. Walnut Creek. Left Coast Press.
Charmaz, K (2011). A constructivist Grounded Theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In Wertz, F. J. et al.. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis. New York. The Guilford Press.
Creswell, J. W. & Poth C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4Th ED.). London. Sage.
Denscombe, M. (2021). The good research guide: research guide for small-scale social research projects (7ª Ed.). Open University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2016). The qualitative manifesto: a call to arms. New York. Routlege.
Denzin, N. K. & Giardina, M. D. (2016). Qualitative inquiry ‘outside’ the academy. In Denzin, N. K. & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). Qualitative inquiry outside the academy. New York. Routlege.
Dick, B. (2014). Action Research. In Mills, J. & Birks, M. (Ed.). Qualitative methods: a practical guide. London. SAGE.
Elias, N. (2016). La dynamique sociale: sociologie de la connaissance et des sciences. Paris. Éditions la Découverte.
Emerson, M. R., Fretz, R. I. & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd Ed.). Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.
Flick, U. (2018). Introduction to qualitative research (6th Ed). London. SAGE.
Flick, U. & Röhnsh, G. (2016). Episodic end expert interviews beyond academia: health service research in the context of migration. In Denzin, N. K. & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). Qualitative inquiry outside the academy. New York. New York. Routlege.
Frankl, V. (2017). A falta de sentido na vida. Lisboa. Pergaminho.
Ghiglione, R. & Matalon, B. (1998). Les enquêtes sociologiques: theories et pratique. Paris. Armand Colin
Gil, A. C. (2022). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (7ª Edição). São Paulo. Atlas.
Goertz, G. (2017). Mutimethods research, casual mechanisms and case studies: An integrated approach. Princeton. Princeton University Press
Goertz, G. & Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton. Princeton University Press.
Graue, M. E. & Walsh, D. J. (2002). Investigação etnográfica com crianças: teorias, métodos e ética. Lisboa. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Kuckartz, U. & Rädlier, S. (2023). Qualitative content analysis: methods, practice and software. London. SAGE
Hacking, I. (2008). Entre science et reálité: la construction social de qui?. Paris. La Decouverte
Haguette, T. M. F. (1990). Metodologias qualitativas na sociologia (2ª Ed.). Petropolis. Vozes.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: principles in practice. New York. Routlege.
Hammersley, M. & Traianou. A. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research: controversies. London: SAGE
Jurdant, B. (2009). Les problèmes théoriques de la vulgarisation scientifique. Paris. Éditions des archives contemporaines.
Kohout-Dias, M. (2018). L’éducation inclusive: un processus en cours. Tolouse. Eres.
Lincoln, S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London. SAGE.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldaña (2020). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (4th Ed.). London. SAGE.
Mollie, V. B. (2014). Humanizing research with LGBTQ youth through dialogic communication, consciousness raising and action. In Paris, D. & Winn, M. T. (Eds.) Humanizing research: decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. London. SAGE.
Morse, J. M. (2016). The politics of evidence. In In Denzin, N. K. & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). Qualitative inquiry outside the academy. New York. Routlege.
Mourse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2016). Mixed method design: principles and procedures. New York. Routlege
Moustakas, C. & Moustakas, K (2005). Loneliness, creativity & love: awakening meaning in life. S.L. Moustakas, C. & Kerry Moustakas
Moustakas, C. (1995). Being-in, being-for, being-with. Maryland. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, inc .
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London. SAGE.
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic Research: design, methodology and applications. London. SAGE.
Peretz, H. (2007). Les méthodes en sociologie: l’observation. La Decouverte.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago. The University Press of Chicago.
Ragin, C.C. & Amoroso, L. M. (2019). Constructing Social Research: the unity and diversity of method. London. Sage
Rapley, T. (2008). Doing conversation, discourse, and document analysis. SAGE.
Ritzer, G. (2019). The Mcdolnalization of society (9th Ed.). SAGE.
Stern, P. N. & Porr, C. J. (2011). Essential of accessible grounded theory. Walnut Creek. Left Coast Press.
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4ª Ed.). London. SAGE
Strombants, M. (1993). Les traces de l’habilitation. In Savoir-Faire et competences au travail: un socologie de la fabrication des aptitudes (pp. 295 – 329). Bruxelles. Editions de L’Université de Bruxelles.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th Ed.). London. SAGE.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2ª Ed.). New York. The Guilforf Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Serafim Camalhão, Maria Isabel Palmeira Mota Ferreira Camalhão
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.