Development of higher education institutions in the current conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.nse2.119-128Keywords:
autonomy, consumption of educational services, higher education, requirements to higher education, self-government of universities, pedagogical technologiesAbstract
The dynamic development of modern pedagogical science is characterized by the search for basic approaches to building the educational process in higher education. It is aimed at educating and training a professionally competent, proactive, creative specialist with highly developed personal and creative skills. Such a specialist should be endowed with a sense of duty and responsibility to society. Moreover, he or she must be able to quickly adapt to the modern world, characterized by an increased role of the individual, and intellectualization of his or her activities in the face of rapid changes in the development of science and information technology. The article aims to identify the patterns and clarify the main vectors of higher education development, given the conditions and current requirements. In the course of the study, the analytical method was applied to study the scientific literature on the development of HEIs. To study and process the data, the authors employed such methods as analysis, synthesis of information, induction, deduction, systemic and structural, comparative, logical, and linguistic methods, abstraction, and idealization. Moreover, the authors of the study conducted an online survey to clarify the most important issues related to the peculiarities of the development of HEIs practically. Based on the results of the study, the main most important vectors of higher education development were identified, and the opinion of scientists and heads of HEIs on key practical aspects of higher education development was investigated.References
Akour, M. & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher Education Future in the Era of Digital Transformation, Education Sciences, 12, 11, 784. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110784
Arruabarrena, R., Sánchez, A.,Blanco, J.M., Vadillo, J.A. & Usandizaga, I. (2019). Integration of good practices of active methodologies with the reuse of student-generated content. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-019-0140-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0140-7
Bali, M. & Caines, A. (2018). A call for promoting ownership, equity, and agency in faculty development via connected learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 46. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-018-0128-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0128-8
Boya-Lara, C., Saavedra, D., Fehrenbach A. & Marquez-Araque, A. (2022). Development of a course based on BEAM robots to enhance STEM learning in electrical, electronic, and mechanical domains. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 7. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00311-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00311-9
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H. & Wang, F. L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 2. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6
Cheung, S. K. S., Kwok, L. F., Phusavat, K. & Yang, H. H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 16. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A. & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412722000137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers' strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-25. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Hod, Y., & Katz, S. (2020). Fostering highly engaged knowledge-building communities in socioemotional and sociocognitive hybrid learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 1117-1135. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12910. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12910
López Catalán, L., López Catalán, B. & Prieto Jiménez, E. (2018). Tendencias innovadoras en la formación on-line. La oferta web de postgrados e-learning y blended-learning en España. Píxel-Bit. Revista De Medios Y Educación, 53, 93-107. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/article/view/63095. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.06
Martínez, J. P. C., Catasús, M. G. & Fontanillas, T. R. (2020). Impact of using learning analytics in asynchronous online discussions in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 39. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00217-y. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00217-y
Mumford, S. & Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Pre-service language teachers' reflection development through online interaction in a hybrid learning course. Computers & Education, 144, 103706. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131519302593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103706.
Raffaghelli, J. E., Manca, S., Stewart, B., Prinsloo, P. & Sangrà, A. (2020). Supporting the development of critical data literacies in higher education: building blocks for fair data cultures in society. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 58. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00235-w. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00235-w
Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F. & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12, 280. https://www.cedtech.net/article/psychological-aspects-of-digital-learning-a-self-determination-theory-perspective-8584. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584
Tait, A. (2018). Education for development: from distance to open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5, 101-115. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/294. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i2.294
Verde, A. & Valero, J.M. (2021). Teaching and Learning Modalities in Higher Education During the Pandemic: Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019 From Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648592/full. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648592.
Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, J. & Jiang, F. (2020). Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet, 395, 945-947. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30547-X/fulltext. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30547-X
Widyasari, Y. D. L., Nugroho, L. E. & Permanasari, A. E. (2019). Persuasive technology for enhanced learning behavior in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 15. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-019-0142-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0142-5
Xu, W., Wu, Y. & Ouyang, F. (2023). Multimodal learning analytics of collaborative patterns during pair programming in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-022-00377-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00377-z
Zhao, Y., Wang, A.& Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103721. ttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S036013151930274X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Serhii Kubitskyi , Inna Shorobur , Natalia Yevdokymova , Tetiana Vlasiuk , Larysa Shevchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.