Digital Technologies in the Process of Teaching STEM Disciplines:
Challenges and Prospects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.n1.445-458Resumo
The modern integration of digital technologies into the educational process requires additional study, given the opportunities that this process opens up. The purpose of the article is to study the use of digital technologies in STEM education through the prism of researching the main challenges and prospects. To achieve this goal, the methods of questionnaires and interviews were used. In particular, 65 teachers of higher education institutions were interviewed, whose opinions became the basis for forming a generalised picture of the study. The results show that modern teachers actively use digital technologies in STEM education. The average level of digital technology use among STEM teachers is high: 43 people (65%) use technology at grade levels 4 and 5. However, this intensive use of digital technologies in STEM education raises both challenges and opportunities. In particular, today's teachers often face limited access to the necessary technical infrastructure, which can limit their ability to implement digital tools. Poor quality of internet connection can affect the smoothness and efficiency of using online resources. Insufficient training of teachers in the use of digital technologies is also a significant challenge. Increasing the availability of digital resources for teachers will make learning more accessible and diverse. Cooperation between universities and technology companies also opens up new opportunities for the development of STEM education. The conclusions emphasise that such interaction facilitates the exchange of experience, access to advanced technologies and resources, and creates conditions for the implementation of joint projects and programmes.Referências
Adegoke, O. T., Akinrinola, F. Y., & Ogegbo, A. A. (2023). ICT integration in STEM education in Rwanda. In O. T. Adegoke, F. Y. Akinrinola, & A. A. Ogegbo (Eds.), Information and Communications Technology in STEM Education (pp. 68-81). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003279310-5
Ataeva, N. (2022). Teaching natural sciences through the prism of philosophy: An attempt to define the relationship. Futurity Philosophy, 1(4), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.02
Bakhmat, N., Kruty, K., Tolchieva, H., & Pushkarova, T. (2022). Modernization of future teachers’ professional training: On the role of immersive technologies. Futurity Education, 2(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.22
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Chabalengula, V. M., & Banda, A. (2023). ICT integration in Zambian high school STEM education. In V. M. Chabalengula & A. Banda (Eds.), Information and Communications Technology in STEM Education (pp. 14-30). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003279310-2
Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). STEM’s what, why, and how? Ontology, axiology, and epistemology. In N. Z. Chesky & M. R. Wolfmeyer (Eds.), Philosophy of STEM Education (pp. 17-43). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535467_2
Deyoe, M. M., Newman, D. L., & Lamendola, J. M. (2015). Mobile technology in higher education. In M. M. Deyoe, D. L. Newman, & J. M. Lamendola (Eds.), STEM Education (pp. 481-505). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7363-2.ch026
Enguta Mwenzi, J., & Andia Moyamani, E. (2023). Social networks addictions and academic performance of students at the University of Kinshasa. Futurity Education, 3(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.06.25.13
Hasan, M., Khan, M. S. H., & Ahmed, A. K. M. F. (2024). Application of variation theory in STEM education: A comprehensive guideline for STEM teachers. MethodsX, 12, 102500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102500
Henry, M., Méango, R., & Mourifié, I. (2024). Role models and revealed gender-specific costs of STEM in an extended Roy model of major choice. Journal of Econometrics, 238(2), 105571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105571
Hsu, Y.-S., & Fang, S.-C. (2019). Opportunities and challenges of STEM education. In Y.-S. Hsu & S.-C. Fang (Eds.), Asia-Pacific STEM Teaching Practices (pp. 1-16). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0768-7_1
Huffman, D., Thomas, K., & Basham, J. D. (2020). The transdisciplinary nature of STEAM education. In D. Huffman, K. Thomas, & J. D. Basham (Eds.), Challenges and Opportunities for Transforming From STEM to STEAM Education (pp. 221-237). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2517-3.ch009
Jamali, S. M., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Jamali, F. (2022). The role of STEM education in improving the quality of education: A bibliometric study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09762-1
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2023). STEM education as a meta-discipline. In T. J. Kennedy & M. R. L. Odell (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Science and Technology Education (pp. 37-51). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24259-5_4
Kharitonenko, L. (2022). Innovations and traditions in Ukrainian language teaching at the educational establishments of Ukraine: Cases, models of the future. Futurity Education, 2(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.25.03.7
Krymets, L. (2022). What must the education of the future be like to be really future? (Attempts of philosophical reflection). Futurity Philosophy, 1(4), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.03
Moosa, S., Ncube, R., & Ramnarain, U. (2023). Translating policy to practice. In S. Moosa, R. Ncube, & U. Ramnarain (Eds.), Information and Communications Technology in STEM Education (pp. 1-13). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003279310-1
Myronenko, S., Dzhym, V., Prots, T., Kubatko, A., & Saienko, V. (2022). Formation and activation of a healthy lifestyle through sports. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(02-XXXI), 36-40. Retrieved from https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-2243624
Peni, N. R. N., & Dewi, D. A. K. (2023). Development research framework for designing functions class using Desmos. Futurity Education, 3(4), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.12.25.05
Pérez Torres, M., Couso Lagarón, D., & Marquez Bargalló, C. (2023). Evaluation of STEAM project-based learning (STEAM PBL) instructional designs from the STEM practices perspective. Education Sciences, 14(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010053
Pranata, R., Syahril, & Megahati S., R. R. P. (2023). STEM education in science learning: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4655
Pratama, R. A., Saputra, M. A., & Hikmawaty, L. (2024). Enhancing historical consciousness in history education through integrating STEM approach and historical thinking skill. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20890
Salnyk, I., Grin, L., Yefimov, D., & Beztsinna, Z. (2023). The future of higher education: Implementation of virtual and augmented reality in the educational process. Futurity Education, 3(3), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.09.25.03
Sidorova, I., Smolina, O., Khomiakova, O., Andriichuk, P., & Romaniuk, L. (2022). Introduction of the latest teaching practices and development of the educational process in the field of culture and art: The experience of EU countries. Revista de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación en Educación, 16(2), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2022.16.02.4
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Tkachenko, L., Kushevskaya, N., Kabysh, M. (2023). Evaluating future teacher competencies in the face of contemporary global challenges: A comprehensive analysis. Futurity Education, 3(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.06.25.06
Tsekhmister, Y., Chalyi, A., & Chalyy, K. (2009). Teaching and learning of medical physics and biomedical engineering in Ukrainian medical universities. In Y. Tsekhmister, A. Chalyi, & K. Chalyy (Eds.), IFMBE Proceedings (pp. 383-384). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03893-8_110
Tsekhmister, Y., Konovalova, T., & Tsekhmister, B. (2022). Quality control of educational process in the lyceum of medical profile when learning in distance mode during the COVID-19 pandemic. Amazonia Investiga, 11(57), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.57.09.13
Tsekhmister, Y., Kotyk, T., Matviienko, Y., Rudenko, Y., & Ilchuk, V. (2021). The effectiveness of augmented reality technology in STEAM education. Apuntes Universitarios, 12(1), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i5.932
Vandeyar, T. (2013). Practice as policy in ICT for education: Catalysing communities of practice in education in South Africa. Technology in Society, 35(4), 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.10.002
Yuskovych-Zhukovska, V., Bogut, O., Lotyuk, Y., Kravchuck, O., Rudenko, O., & VasylEnko, H. (2022). E-Learning in a postmodern society. Postmodern Openings, 13(1 Sup1), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/435
Zander, L., & Ertl, B. (2023). Female students' belonging uncertainty in higher education STEM environments. In L. Zander & B. Ertl (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Gender Beliefs, Stereotype Threat, and Teacher Expectations (pp. 67-78). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275763-8
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Halyna Hubal, Andrii Siasiev, Volodymyr Sipii, Iryna Syrmamiikh, Serhii Burtovyi
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
The BRAJETS follows the policy for Open Access Journals, provides immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and provides more international democratization of knowledge. Therefore, no fees apply, whether for submission, evaluation, publication, viewing or downloading of articles. In this sense, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms: A) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal. B) Authors are authorized to distribute non-exclusively the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in the institutional and non-institutional repository, as well as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. C) Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, online repositories or on their personal page), as well as to increase the impact and citation of the published work.